+7.4 ptsvs 79.6 average · 2,024 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
462 of 2,024tied with 64 others
Score vs region
+1.3 ptsvs 85.7 average · 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg
Region 01: Edinburg placement
243 of 505tied with 32 others
Score vs county
−1.3 ptsvs 88.3 average · 76 rated schools in Webb County
Webb County placement
47 of 76tied with 1 other
Score vs similar-size group
+6.4 ptsvs 80.6 average · 4,413 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,300 of 4,413tied with 196 others
Score vs state
+5.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
2,456 of 7,646tied with 307 others
B87
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 98 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 79.6 average for 2,024 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg.The current score is below the 88.3 average for 76 rated schools in Webb County.The current score is above the 80.6 average for 4,413 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
55%vs 47.2% avg · +7.8 pts
Masters
26%vs 19.1% avg · +6.9 pts
Among 1,911 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Barbara Fasken Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.6 average for 2,024 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 12 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 462nd of 2,024 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 64 others).
Barbara Fasken Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 85.7 average for 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg. It is down 12 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 243rd of 505 rated schools in Region 01: Edinburg (tied with 32 others).
Barbara Fasken Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 88.3 average for 76 rated schools in Webb County. It is down 12 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 47th of 76 rated schools in Webb County (tied with 1 other).
Barbara Fasken Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.6 average for 4,413 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 12 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,300th of 4,413 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 196 others).
Barbara Fasken Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 87 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 12 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 98 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement80 B+3.1 vs similar economic context · 1,911 reporting
School Progress85 B+4.4 vs similar economic context · 1,904 reporting
Closing the Gaps92 A+15.1 vs similar economic context · 1,887 reporting
Academic Growth76 C+2.3 vs similar economic context · 1,843 reporting
Relative Performance85 B+6.0 vs similar economic context · 1,904 reporting
Barbara Fasken Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,024 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
80
B
10
School Progress
85
B
5
Closing the Gaps
92
A
—
Academic Growth
76
C
4
Relative Performance
85
B
5
Closest to moving up: School Progress, 5 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (85), so
Student Achievement (80) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 85.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level78%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,911 reporting
Meets grade level55%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,911 reporting
Masters grade level26%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,911 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level83%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,908 reporting
Meets grade level64%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,908 reporting
Masters grade level32%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,908 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level78%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 reporting
Meets grade level51%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 reporting
Masters grade level23%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level66%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,756 reporting
Meets grade level44%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,756 reporting
Masters grade level17%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,756 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,024 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
680
Economically disadvantaged
67.5%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
57.9%+38.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
16.0%−2.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.6%+1.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
9.3%−7.9 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Barbara Fasken Elem
African American 0.3%
Hispanic 97.5%
White 0.7%
Asian 0.6%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 0.7%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,024 reporting for every category shown · 2,024 in full cohort
African American 12%
Hispanic 54.4%
White 27.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
African American 0.2%
Hispanic 97.5%
White 1.9%
Asian 0.3%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Webb County · 76 reporting for every category shown · 76 in full cohort
African American 0.1%
Hispanic 98.3%
White 1.3%
Asian 0.2%
Two or More Races 0.1%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,413 reporting for every category shown · 4,413 in full cohort
African American 12.4%
Hispanic 54%
White 24.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
680
Economically disadvantaged students
459
Emergent bilingual students
394
Special education students
109
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
43
Students in TEA mobility denominator
550
TEA-published mobility rate
7.8%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 680 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 24 (3.4%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
680
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−24
Decrease · −3.4%
Change since 2021–22
−28
Decrease · −4.0%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
680
Selected comparison
638.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,989 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Barbara Fasken Elem
School year
Students enrolledBarbara Fasken Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
708
First available year
650
2022–23
707
Decrease of 1 (0.1%)
657.3
2023–24
725
Increase of 18 (2.5%)
657
2024–25
704
Decrease of 21 (2.9%)
654
2025–26
680
Decrease of 24 (3.4%)
638.2
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
715
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Barbara Fasken Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
818
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
748
12
1.6%
14
1.87
12.7%
30
2022–23
732
11
1.5%
13
1.78
13.3%
32.1
2023–24
751
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2024–25
715
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Barbara Fasken Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Barbara Fasken Elem
Parent district: United ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$8,935
Selected comparison
$13,196
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,999 rated schools reporting
−$4,261 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $8,935 per student for this campus, $14,348 per student for its parent district, United ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Barbara Fasken Elem
Parent district: United ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$6,743
$13,187
$13,054
$7,991
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,860 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,039
$12,568
$13,108
$8,150
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,876 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,253
$12,004
$14,058
$8,709
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,896 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,628
$13,076
$14,797
$9,202
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,909 rated schools reporting
2022
$7,822
$15,006
$15,708
$10,483
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,932 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,119
$14,779
$16,792
$11,210
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,955 rated schools reporting
2024
$8,279
$15,029
$18,125
$12,332
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,984 rated schools reporting
2025
$8,935
$14,348
$18,972
$13,196
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,999 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$67,622+$1,071 vs similar economic context
Teachers
45+1.6 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.2+1.3 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Barbara Fasken Elem
1 to 5 years 10.7%
6 to 10 years 4.5%
11 to 20 years 35.8%
21 to 30 years 35.6%
Over 30 years 13.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,024 reporting for every category shown · 2,024 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 26.6%
6 to 10 years 19.1%
11 to 20 years 27.9%
21 to 30 years 15.6%
Over 30 years 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 01: Edinburg · 505 reporting for every category shown · 505 in full cohort
Beginning 2.7%
1 to 5 years 19.3%
6 to 10 years 16.2%
11 to 20 years 35%
21 to 30 years 22.6%
Over 30 years 4.2%
Selected comparison averageFor Webb County · 76 reporting for every category shown · 76 in full cohort
Beginning 2.5%
1 to 5 years 18.4%
6 to 10 years 16%
11 to 20 years 32.7%
21 to 30 years 25.1%
Over 30 years 5.2%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,413 reporting for every category shown · 4,413 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.6%
6 to 10 years 19.9%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.3%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Barbara Fasken Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classBarbara Fasken Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
16
18
Grade 1
19
18.2
Grade 2
17.9
18.4
Grade 3
19.1
18.7
Grade 4
19.1
19
Grade 5
21.7
20
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 240903131.