Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Banquete HS

Nueces County · Region 02: Corpus Christi · 215 students

Current score
92/1002025-26
Change
+6 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+14.4 ptsvs 77.6 average · 2,200 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
108 of 2,200tied with 33 others
A92

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 89 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.6 average for 2,200 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 8 points

84 to 92 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 92 is 14.4 points above the 77.6 average among 2,200 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Academic Growth rose 24 points

55 to 79 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 79 is 6.8 points above the 72.2 average among 1,984 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
62%vs 37.4% avg · +24.6 pts
Masters
18%vs 15.5% avg · +2.5 pts

Among 1,882 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Banquete HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 92 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.6 average for 2,200 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 6 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 108th of 2,200 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 33 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageBanquete HS 8680808492 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 89 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9277.6 2,200 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8477.2 2,187 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8074.7 2,173 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8075.2 2,156 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8681.6 2,136 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement89 B+16.7 vs similar economic context · 2,036 reporting
  • School Progress91 A+12.1 vs similar economic context · 2,029 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps95 A+20.2 vs similar economic context · 2,015 reporting
  • Academic Growth79 C+6.8 vs similar economic context · 1,984 reporting
  • Relative Performance91 A+13.8 vs similar economic context · 2,029 reporting
  • Banquete HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,200 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement89B1
School Progress91A—
Closing the Gaps95A—
Academic Growth79C1
Relative Performance91A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (91), so Student Achievement (89) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 91.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level83%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,036 reporting
  • Meets grade level55%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,036 reporting
  • Masters grade level9%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,036 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level75%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,034 reporting
  • Meets grade level60%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,034 reporting
  • Masters grade level2%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,034 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level83%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,024 reporting
  • Meets grade level38%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,024 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,024 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level88%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,882 reporting
  • Meets grade level62%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,882 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,882 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level98%+32 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 811 reporting
  • Meets grade level57%+19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 811 reporting
  • Masters grade level13%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 811 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,200 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
100.0%+7.4 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 328 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
97.3%+5.2 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 329 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
97.9%+6.6 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 329 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.8%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 330 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
95.0%+10.2 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria95.0%84.8%+10.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 371 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course60.6%56.9%+3.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA37.9%22.9%+15.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)6.1%11.9%−5.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course37.9%30.3%+7.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification69.7%35.6%+34.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate6.1%2.7%+3.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree6.1%6.9%−0.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%5.4%−5.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness6.1%3.2%+2.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student7.6%8.1%−0.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces1.5%2.7%−1.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 373 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
69

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
44

63.8% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
25

36.2% of graduates

Not trackable
0

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
69
Selected comparison
264

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
44
Selected comparison
108.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
63.8%
Selected comparison
40.6%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting

+23.2 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
36.2%
Selected comparison
53.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting

−17.1 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
0.0%
Selected comparison
6.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 325 rated schools reporting

−6.2 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. TEXAS A&M UNIV-KINGSVILLE (003639)13
  2. DEL MAR COLLEGE (003563)11
  3. TEXAS A&M UNIV-CORPUS CHRISTI (011161)6

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
215
Economically disadvantaged
80.5%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
3.3%−26.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
11.6%−7.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
92.6%−0.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
25.9%+5.2 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Banquete HS

Hispanic: 86.5%White: 13%American Indian: 0.5%
  • Hispanic 86.5%
  • White 13%
  • American Indian 0.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,200 reporting for every category shown · 2,200 in full cohort

African American: 13.9%Hispanic: 68.3%White: 13.1%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.7%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 2.6%
  • African American 13.9%
  • Hispanic 68.3%
  • White 13.1%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 2.6%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
215
Economically disadvantaged students
173
Emergent bilingual students
7
Special education students
25

Early college pathways

Pathways in Technology Early College High School (P-TECH)
61

TEA-published share: 28.4%

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
25
Students in TEA mobility denominator
263
TEA-published mobility rate
9.5%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 215 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 32 (13.0%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
215

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−32

Decrease · −13.0%

Change since 2021–22
−69

Decrease · −24.3%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
215
Selected comparison
628.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,170 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Banquete HS
School yearStudents enrolledBanquete HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 284 First available year 652.5
2022–23 275 Decrease of 9 (3.2%) 655.2
2023–24 292 Increase of 17 (6.2%) 649.4
2024–25 247 Decrease of 45 (15.4%) 647.1
2025–26 215 Decrease of 32 (13.0%) 628.1

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
32

12.2% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
63

23.95 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
263

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
12.2%
Selected comparison
13.3%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,617 rated schools reporting

−1.1 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
23.95
Selected comparison
32.3

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,725 rated schools reporting

−8.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Banquete HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 292 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 305 35 11.5% 59 19.34 12.9% 30.9
2022–23 290 13 4.5% 15 5.17 13.8% 34
2023–24 301 28 9.3% 47 15.61 13.7% 34
2024–25 263 32 12.2% 63 23.95 13.3% 32.3
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Banquete HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 32 12.2% 63 23.95 13.3% 32.3
In-school suspensions 23 8.8% 32 12.17 11.7% 23.4
Out-of-school suspensions 12 4.6% 15 5.70 8.2% 13
DAEP placements 12 4.6% 16 6.08 5.4% 6.5
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements 12 4.6% 16 6.08 3.4% 4
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$17k$26k20182020202220242025
  • Banquete HS
  • Parent district: Banquete ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$15,681
Selected comparison
$13,050

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,186 rated schools reporting

+$2,631 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $15,681 per student for this campus, $24,607 per student for its parent district, Banquete ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearBanquete HSParent district: Banquete ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$10,832$13,400$13,054$8,148 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,070 rated schools reporting
2019$11,912$14,927$13,108$8,269 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,092 rated schools reporting
2020$11,592$16,914$14,058$8,780 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,108 rated schools reporting
2021$12,496$21,973$14,797$9,429 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,119 rated schools reporting
2022$12,385$18,616$15,708$10,857 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,137 rated schools reporting
2023$13,654$19,233$16,792$11,370 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,156 rated schools reporting
2024$12,015$20,853$18,125$12,303 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,172 rated schools reporting
2025$15,681$24,607$18,972$13,050 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,186 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$60,416−$6,737 vs similar economic context
Teachers
25−17.9 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
8.5−5.8 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Banquete HS

Beginning: 23.8%1 to 5 years: 19.4%6 to 10 years: 19.8%11 to 20 years: 19.8%21 to 30 years: 4%Over 30 years: 13.1%
  • Beginning 23.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 19.4%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 19.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 4%
  • Over 30 years 13.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,200 reporting for every category shown · 2,200 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.8%1 to 5 years: 27.6%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.1%21 to 30 years: 15.1%Over 30 years: 3.6%
  • Beginning 6.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.1%
  • Over 30 years 3.6%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Banquete HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classBanquete HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English15.315.3
Secondary languages other than English13.618.3
Secondary math14.916.6
Secondary science15.317.8
Secondary social studies1717.8

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

4 measures

  • 2of 20

    Earned an industry-based certification

    Nueces County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 2of 20

    Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness

    Nueces County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 3of 20

    Earned a level I or level II certificate

    Nueces County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 3of 20

    Earned an associate degree

    Nueces County · of the 20 that report this measure

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

10 measures

  • 4of 39

    Social Studies — Approaches

    Nueces County · of the 39 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 4of 20

    College, career or military ready

    Nueces County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 5of 82

    Closing the Gaps

    Nueces County · of the 82 that report this measure

  • 6of 20

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA

    Nueces County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 7of 20

    Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student

    Nueces County · of the 20 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 20

    Earned college credit for a dual credit course

    Nueces County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 9of 18

    Six-Year Graduation Rate

    Nueces County (standard accountability only) · of the 18 that report this measure

  • 10of 92

    Per-student spending

    Nueces County · of the 92 that report this measure

  • 10of 20

    Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course

    Nueces County · of the 20 that report this measure

  • 10of 18

    Five-Year Graduation Rate

    Nueces County (standard accountability only) · of the 18 that report this measure

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

1 measure

  • 108of 2,200

    Overall score

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 2,200 that report this measure · tied with 33

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 178913001.