Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus

Austin Achieve MS

Austin Achieve Public Schools · Austin · 694 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
65/1002025-26
Change
−8 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−15.6 ptsvs 80.6 average · 419 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
379 of 419tied with 4 others
D65

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 69 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 80.6 average for 419 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

23% −1 pts vs 24%

  • 23% is 1 percentage points lower than the 24% average among 416 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Austin Achieve MS is rated D by TEA, scoring 65 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.6 average for 419 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 379th of 419 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 4 others).

2 consecutive years rated unacceptable.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

2026 federal improvement status

Comprehensive Support and Improvement

Official support label: Comprehensive Identified

Identification reason: CSI Low Performance

TEA track year 1 · Title I campus

Open the official TEA list and methodology

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
28.9%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 419 rated charter campuses reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
0.0%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 419 rated charter campuses reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter averageAustin Achieve MS 7366676765 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated Not Rated with 69 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26D6580.6 419 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25D6779.0 411 reporting81.3 797 reporting
2023-24D6776.8 402 reporting79.5 776 reporting
2022-23D6676.3 391 reporting79.6 749 reporting
2021-22C7383.6 368 reporting84.5 700 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement59 F−15.7 vs similar economic context · 419 reporting
  • School Progress69 D−12.7 vs similar economic context · 419 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps57 F−20.4 vs similar economic context · 415 reporting
  • Academic Growth64 D−9.3 vs similar economic context · 400 reporting
  • Relative Performance69 D−10.9 vs similar economic context · 416 reporting
  • Austin Achieve MS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (419 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement59F1
School Progress69D1
Closing the Gaps57F3
Academic Growth64D6
Relative Performance69D1

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 1 point below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (69), so Student Achievement (59) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 69.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level54%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 419 reporting
  • Meets grade level28%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 419 reporting
  • Masters grade level10%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 419 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level57%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 419 reporting
  • Meets grade level34%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 419 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 419 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level53%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 418 reporting
  • Meets grade level26%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 418 reporting
  • Masters grade level7%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 418 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level56%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 reporting
  • Meets grade level22%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 reporting
  • Masters grade level8%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level42%−28 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 267 reporting
  • Meets grade level18%−21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 267 reporting
  • Masters grade level6%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 267 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (419 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
694
Economically disadvantaged
88.9%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
74.4%+31.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
15.7%+3.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.4%+0.7 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
23.0%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Austin Achieve MS

African American: 6.5%Hispanic: 90.8%White: 1%American Indian: 0.6%Asian: 0.7%Two or More Races: 0.4%
  • African American 6.5%
  • Hispanic 90.8%
  • White 1%
  • American Indian 0.6%
  • Asian 0.7%
  • Two or More Races 0.4%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 419 reporting for every category shown · 419 in full cohort

African American: 18.2%Hispanic: 75%White: 3.7%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.6%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.3%
  • African American 18.2%
  • Hispanic 75%
  • White 3.7%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.6%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
694
Economically disadvantaged students
617
Emergent bilingual students
516
Special education students
109

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
158
Students in TEA mobility denominator
754
TEA-published mobility rate
21%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 694 students in 2025–26, an increase of 25 (3.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
694

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+25

Increase · +3.7%

Change since 2021–22
+92

Increase · +15.3%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
694
Selected comparison
512.8

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 419 rated charter campuses reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Austin Achieve MS
School yearStudents enrolledAustin Achieve MSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 602 First available year 496.2
2022–23 625 Increase of 23 (3.8%) 510.2
2023–24 647 Increase of 22 (3.5%) 515.4
2024–25 669 Increase of 22 (3.4%) 517.3
2025–26 694 Increase of 25 (3.7%) 512.8

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
751

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Austin Achieve MS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 725 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 643 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2022–23 674 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2023–24 699 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2024–25 751 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Austin Achieve MS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$6k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Austin Achieve MS
  • Parent district: Austin Achieve Public Schools
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$7,094
Selected comparison
$11,807

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 413 rated charter campuses reporting

−$4,713 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $7,094 per student for this campus, $16,124 per student for its parent district, Austin Achieve Public Schools, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearAustin Achieve MSParent district: Austin Achieve Public SchoolsTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$9,156$12,478$13,054$8,512 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 250 rated charter campuses reporting
2019$10,228$11,698$13,108$8,665 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 312 rated charter campuses reporting
2020$8,904$13,245$14,058$9,156 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 330 rated charter campuses reporting
2021$8,050$13,958$14,797$9,518 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 358 rated charter campuses reporting
2022$10,494$16,027$15,708$11,346 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 377 rated charter campuses reporting
2023$9,534$17,669$16,792$11,388 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 389 rated charter campuses reporting
2024$8,002$17,087$18,125$11,533 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 399 rated charter campuses reporting
2025$7,094$16,124$18,972$11,807 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 413 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$65,477+$1,560 vs similar economic context
Teachers
32+2.3 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
21.7+3.8 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Austin Achieve MS

Beginning: 15.7%1 to 5 years: 60.5%6 to 10 years: 8.2%11 to 20 years: 15.7%
  • Beginning 15.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 60.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 8.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 15.7%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 419 reporting for every category shown · 419 in full cohort

Beginning: 13.2%1 to 5 years: 47.6%6 to 10 years: 19.8%11 to 20 years: 14.7%21 to 30 years: 4%Over 30 years: 0.7%
  • Beginning 13.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 47.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 14.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 4%
  • Over 30 years 0.7%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Austin Achieve MS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classAustin Achieve MS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 528.624
Grade 634.723.5
Secondary English2918.8
Secondary math32.919.4
Secondary science33.220.2
Secondary social studies33.120.3

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 227825001.