Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus

Austin Achieve HS

Austin Achieve Public Schools · Austin · 608 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
86/1002025-26
Change
+12 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+5.3 ptsvs 80.7 average · 396 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
142 of 396tied with 15 others
B86

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 84 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 80.7 average for 396 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 2 points

84 to 86 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 86 is 5.3 points above the 80.7 average among 396 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Academic Growth rose 13 points

67 to 80 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 80 is 6.7 points above the 73.3 average among 378 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
57%vs 39.7% avg · +17.3 pts
Masters
25%vs 15.3% avg · +9.7 pts

Among 383 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Austin Achieve HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 86 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.7 average for 396 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is up 12 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 142nd of 396 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context (tied with 15 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter averageAustin Achieve HS 7472768486 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 84 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26B8680.7 396 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25B8479.3 390 reporting81.3 797 reporting
2023-24C7677.4 381 reporting79.5 776 reporting
2022-23C7277.2 371 reporting79.6 749 reporting
2021-22C7484.2 351 reporting84.5 700 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement82 B+6.8 vs similar economic context · 396 reporting
  • School Progress87 B+5.2 vs similar economic context · 396 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps82 B+4.6 vs similar economic context · 392 reporting
  • Academic Growth80 B+6.7 vs similar economic context · 378 reporting
  • Relative Performance87 B+7.0 vs similar economic context · 394 reporting
  • Austin Achieve HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (396 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement82B8
School Progress87B3
Closing the Gaps82B8
Academic Growth80B10
Relative Performance87B3

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 3 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (87), so Student Achievement (82) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 87.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level75%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 396 reporting
  • Meets grade level42%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 396 reporting
  • Masters grade level10%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 396 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level66%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 396 reporting
  • Meets grade level45%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 396 reporting
  • Masters grade level4%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 396 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level73%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 reporting
  • Meets grade level11%−24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 reporting
  • Masters grade level3%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 395 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level93%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 383 reporting
  • Meets grade level57%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 383 reporting
  • Masters grade level25%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 383 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level92%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 259 reporting
  • Meets grade level53%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 259 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 259 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (396 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
93.8%+30.9 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 125 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
94.6%+37.0 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 125 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
91.4%+40.1 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 124 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
1.1%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 125 rated charter campuses reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
98.0%+13.8 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria98.0%84.2%+13.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 146 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course83.9%68.7%+15.2 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 148 rated charter campuses reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA33.9%37.1%−3.2 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 148 rated charter campuses reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)63.7%29.8%+33.9 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 148 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course8.9%11.5%−2.6 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 148 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an industry-based certification0.0%14.4%−14.4 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 148 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%0.4%−0.4 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 148 rated charter campuses reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%1.8%−1.8 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 148 rated charter campuses reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit24.2%3.6%+20.6 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 148 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness0.0%1.4%−1.4 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 148 rated charter campuses reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student4.8%8.0%−3.2 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 148 rated charter campuses reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces1.6%1.9%−0.3 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 148 rated charter campuses reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported charter campus percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
140

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
75

53.6% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
48

34.3% of graduates

Not trackable
17

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
140
Selected comparison
79.3

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 118 rated charter campuses reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
75
Selected comparison
39.7

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 118 rated charter campuses reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
53.6%
Selected comparison
46.7%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 118 rated charter campuses reporting

+6.9 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
34.3%
Selected comparison
47.8%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 118 rated charter campuses reporting

−13.5 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
12.1%
Selected comparison
5.5%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 118 rated charter campuses reporting

+6.6 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. AUSTIN COMMUNITY COLLEGE (012015)42
  2. U. OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO (010115)7
  3. TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY (003615)6

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
608
Economically disadvantaged
84.7%−1.2 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
68.6%+27.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
11.8%−1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.1%+0.6 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
27.6%+2.6 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Austin Achieve HS

African American: 5.9%Hispanic: 91.6%White: 1.6%Asian: 0.7%Two or More Races: 0.2%
  • African American 5.9%
  • Hispanic 91.6%
  • White 1.6%
  • Asian 0.7%
  • Two or More Races 0.2%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 396 reporting for every category shown · 396 in full cohort

African American: 17.6%Hispanic: 74.9%White: 4.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.5%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.4%
  • African American 17.6%
  • Hispanic 74.9%
  • White 4.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
608
Economically disadvantaged students
515
Emergent bilingual students
417
Special education students
72

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
131
Students in TEA mobility denominator
655
TEA-published mobility rate
20%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 608 students in 2025–26, an increase of 27 (4.6%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
608

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+27

Increase · +4.6%

Change since 2021–22
−13

Decrease · −2.1%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
608
Selected comparison
518.4

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 396 rated charter campuses reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Austin Achieve HS
School yearStudents enrolledAustin Achieve HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 621 First available year 495.3
2022–23 645 Increase of 24 (3.9%) 514.4
2023–24 633 Decrease of 12 (1.9%) 517.8
2024–25 581 Decrease of 52 (8.2%) 519.3
2025–26 608 Increase of 27 (4.6%) 518.4

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Not reported

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Not reported

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
655

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Austin Achieve HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 609 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 668 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 704 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2023–24 682 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2024–25 655 Not reported — Not reported — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Austin Achieve HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Not reported — Not reported — — —
In-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Not reported — Not reported — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$5k$12k$20k2020202220242025
  • Austin Achieve HS
  • Parent district: Austin Achieve Public Schools
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,943
Selected comparison
$11,822

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 392 rated charter campuses reporting

−$2,879 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,943 per student for this campus, $16,124 per student for its parent district, Austin Achieve Public Schools, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearAustin Achieve HSParent district: Austin Achieve Public SchoolsTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2020$5,263$13,245$14,058$9,353 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 309 rated charter campuses reporting
2021$7,221$13,958$14,797$9,552 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 341 rated charter campuses reporting
2022$8,338$16,027$15,708$11,183 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 358 rated charter campuses reporting
2023$8,633$17,669$16,792$11,296 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 369 rated charter campuses reporting
2024$8,810$17,087$18,125$11,654 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 378 rated charter campuses reporting
2025$8,943$16,124$18,972$11,822 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 392 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$68,533+$4,893 vs similar economic context
Teachers
38+7.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
16.1−1.8 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Austin Achieve HS

Beginning: 15.9%1 to 5 years: 54.5%6 to 10 years: 17.7%11 to 20 years: 11.9%
  • Beginning 15.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 54.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 17.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 11.9%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 396 reporting for every category shown · 396 in full cohort

Beginning: 13.3%1 to 5 years: 47.2%6 to 10 years: 19.9%11 to 20 years: 14.7%21 to 30 years: 4.2%Over 30 years: 0.7%
  • Beginning 13.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 47.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 14.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 4.2%
  • Over 30 years 0.7%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Austin Achieve HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classAustin Achieve HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English22.318.7
Secondary languages other than English25.317.6
Secondary math32.918.9
Secondary science34.819.8
Secondary social studies35.820

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 227825004.