+4.4 ptsvs 79.6 average · 2,026 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
683 of 2,026tied with 85 others
Score vs region
+2.5 ptsvs 81.5 average · 142 rated schools in Region 08: Mt Pleasant
Region 08: Mt Pleasant placement
57 of 142tied with 11 others
Score vs county
−1.1 ptsvs 85.1 average · 16 rated schools in Cass County
Cass County placement
9 of 16tied with 1 other
Score vs similar-size group
+3.9 ptsvs 80.1 average · 4,496 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
1,736 of 4,496tied with 147 others
Score vs state
+2.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
3,325 of 7,646tied with 275 others
B84
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 91 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 79.6 average for 2,026 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 81.5 average for 142 rated schools in Region 08: Mt Pleasant.The current score is below the 85.1 average for 16 rated schools in Cass County.The current score is above the 80.1 average for 4,496 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
56%vs 47.3% avg · +8.7 pts
Masters
28%vs 19.2% avg · +8.8 pts
Among 1,917 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Atlanta Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 79.6 average for 2,026 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 683rd of 2,026 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 85 others).
Atlanta Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.5 average for 142 rated schools in Region 08: Mt Pleasant. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 57th of 142 rated schools in Region 08: Mt Pleasant (tied with 11 others).
Atlanta Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 85.1 average for 16 rated schools in Cass County. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 9th of 16 rated schools in Cass County (tied with 1 other).
Atlanta Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.1 average for 4,496 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 1,736th of 4,496 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 147 others).
Atlanta Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 84 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 8 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 91 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement82 B+4.9 vs similar economic context · 1,917 reporting
School Progress86 B+5.4 vs similar economic context · 1,909 reporting
Closing the Gaps78 C+1.2 vs similar economic context · 1,892 reporting
Academic Growth81 B+7.3 vs similar economic context · 1,849 reporting
Relative Performance86 B+7.1 vs similar economic context · 1,909 reporting
Atlanta Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,026 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
82
B
8
School Progress
86
B
4
Closing the Gaps
78
C
2
Academic Growth
81
B
9
Relative Performance
86
B
4
Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (86), so
Student Achievement (82) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 86.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level77%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 reporting
Meets grade level56%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 reporting
Masters grade level28%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,917 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level79%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,914 reporting
Meets grade level58%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,914 reporting
Masters grade level31%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,914 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level78%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,905 reporting
Meets grade level58%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,905 reporting
Masters grade level27%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,905 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level71%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,755 reporting
Meets grade level42%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,755 reporting
Masters grade level19%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,755 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,026 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
458
Economically disadvantaged
66.8%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
3.3%−15.6 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
30.6%+11.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.4%+0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
16.0%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Atlanta Elem
African American 26.9%
Hispanic 9.2%
White 54.6%
American Indian 0.4%
Asian 0.7%
Two or More Races 8.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,026 reporting for every category shown · 2,026 in full cohort
African American 11.8%
Hispanic 53.5%
White 28.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.2%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 142 reporting for every category shown · 142 in full cohort
African American 16.3%
Hispanic 21.3%
White 54.6%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 0.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 6.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Cass County · 16 reporting for every category shown · 16 in full cohort
African American 15.1%
Hispanic 9.7%
White 68.1%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.6%
Two or More Races 6.3%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,496 reporting for every category shown · 4,496 in full cohort
African American 11.9%
Hispanic 55.2%
White 25.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 3.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
458
Economically disadvantaged students
306
Emergent bilingual students
15
Special education students
140
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
43
Students in TEA mobility denominator
477
TEA-published mobility rate
9%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 458 students in 2025–26, an increase of 11 (2.5%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
458
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+11
Increase · +2.5%
Change since 2021–22
+31
Increase · +7.3%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
458
Selected comparison
635.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,993 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Atlanta Elem
School year
Students enrolledAtlanta Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
427
First available year
647.1
2022–23
449
Increase of 22 (5.2%)
654.5
2023–24
435
Decrease of 14 (3.1%)
653.4
2024–25
447
Increase of 12 (2.8%)
650.6
2025–26
458
Increase of 11 (2.5%)
635.8
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
31
6.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
78
16.35 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
477
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
6.5%
Selected comparison
12.8%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,554 rated schools reporting
−6.3 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
16.35
Selected comparison
30.3
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,664 rated schools reporting
−13.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Atlanta Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
432
21
4.9%
31
7.18
9.7%
19.3
2021–22
467
Suppressed
—
14
3.00
—
30.1
2022–23
479
35
7.3%
55
11.48
13.3%
32.1
2023–24
451
36
8.0%
69
15.30
13.2%
31.7
2024–25
477
31
6.5%
78
16.35
12.8%
30.3
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Atlanta Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
31
6.5%
78
16.35
12.8%
30.3
In-school suspensions
30
6.3%
58
12.16
11.5%
23
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
10
2.1%
13
2.73
5.1%
6.1
Mandatory DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Atlanta Elem
Parent district: Atlanta ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,449
Selected comparison
$13,259
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,002 rated schools reporting
−$3,810 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,449 per student for this campus, $18,408 per student for its parent district, Atlanta ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Atlanta Elem
Parent district: Atlanta ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,786
$11,239
$13,054
$7,979
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,865 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,693
$12,212
$13,108
$8,143
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,881 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,960
$12,156
$14,058
$8,717
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 rated schools reporting
2021
$7,943
$13,198
$14,797
$9,203
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,913 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,033
$13,196
$15,708
$10,490
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,934 rated schools reporting
2023
$8,824
$18,333
$16,792
$11,202
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,957 rated schools reporting
2024
$9,639
$16,645
$18,125
$12,347
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,986 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,449
$18,408
$18,972
$13,259
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,002 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$56,698−$9,768 vs similar economic context
Teachers
36−7.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.8−1.1 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Atlanta Elem
Beginning 2.8%
1 to 5 years 20.9%
6 to 10 years 27.9%
11 to 20 years 27.6%
21 to 30 years 12.5%
Over 30 years 8.4%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,026 reporting for every category shown · 2,026 in full cohort
Beginning 6.3%
1 to 5 years 26.5%
6 to 10 years 19%
11 to 20 years 27.9%
21 to 30 years 15.6%
Over 30 years 4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 08: Mt Pleasant · 142 reporting for every category shown · 142 in full cohort
Beginning 5.6%
1 to 5 years 24.2%
6 to 10 years 18.4%
11 to 20 years 27.3%
21 to 30 years 17.2%
Over 30 years 6.5%
Selected comparison averageFor Cass County · 16 reporting for every category shown · 16 in full cohort
Beginning 7.5%
1 to 5 years 24.4%
6 to 10 years 18.4%
11 to 20 years 26.1%
21 to 30 years 17.6%
Over 30 years 6%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,496 reporting for every category shown · 4,496 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26%
6 to 10 years 19.3%
11 to 20 years 28.9%
21 to 30 years 16.1%
Over 30 years 3.4%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Atlanta Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classAtlanta Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 3
20.8
18.7
Grade 4
17.5
19
Grade 5
20
19.9
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 3 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
1 measure
1of 15
All Subjects — Masters
Cass County · of the 15 that report this measure
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
4 measures
2of 15
Academic Growth
Cass County · of the 15 that report this measure
2of 15
Reading — Masters
Cass County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 15
Math — Meets
Cass County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 1
2of 15
Math — Masters
Cass County · of the 15 that report this measure
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
11 measures
4of 15
All Subjects — Meets
Cass County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 2
7of 16
Chronically absent (lowest is best)
Cass County · of the 16 that report this measure
7of 15
Reading — Approaches
Cass County · of the 15 that report this measure
7of 15
Math — Approaches
Cass County · of the 15 that report this measure
7of 14
Science — Masters
Cass County · of the 14 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 15
School Progress
Cass County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 15
Relative Performance
Cass County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 15
All Subjects — Approaches
Cass County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 1
8of 15
Reading — Meets
Cass County · of the 15 that report this measure
9of 16
Overall score
Cass County · of the 16 that report this measure · tied with 1
9of 15
Student Achievement
Cass County · of the 15 that report this measure
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 034901106.