Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Aspermont SchoolsA96vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Aspermont Schools
Stonewall County · Region 14: Abilene · 210 students
Current score
96/1002025-26
Change
+15 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+15.0 ptsvs 81 average · 1,928 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
38 of 1,928tied with 20 others
Score vs region
+15.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 122 rated schools in Region 14: Abilene
Region 14: Abilene placement
4 of 122tied with 2 others
Score vs similar-size group
+14.8 ptsvs 81.2 average · 1,411 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
35 of 1,411tied with 23 others
Score vs state
+14.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
146 of 7,646tied with 100 others
A96
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 81 average for 1,928 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 80.5 average for 122 rated schools in Region 14: Abilene.The current score is above the 81.2 average for 1,411 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
70%vs 50.4% avg · +19.6 pts
Masters
28%vs 20.9% avg · +7.1 pts
Among 1,851 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Aspermont Schools is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81 average for 1,928 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 15 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 38th of 1,928 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 20 others).
Aspermont Schools is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.5 average for 122 rated schools in Region 14: Abilene. It is up 15 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 4th of 122 rated schools in Region 14: Abilene (tied with 2 others).
Aspermont Schools is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.2 average for 1,411 similarly sized rated schools. It is up 15 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 35th of 1,411 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 23 others).
Aspermont Schools is rated A by TEA, scoring 96 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is up 15 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement96 A+16.3 vs similar economic context · 1,851 reporting
School Progress96 A+14.6 vs similar economic context · 1,844 reporting
Closing the Gaps95 A+16.8 vs similar economic context · 1,827 reporting
Academic Growth86 B+11.4 vs similar economic context · 1,790 reporting
Relative Performance96 A+16.5 vs similar economic context · 1,844 reporting
Aspermont Schools
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,928 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
96
A
—
School Progress
96
A
—
Closing the Gaps
95
A
—
Academic Growth
86
B
4
Relative Performance
96
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level89%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,851 reporting
Meets grade level70%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,851 reporting
Masters grade level28%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,851 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,848 reporting
Meets grade level76%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,848 reporting
Masters grade level28%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,848 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level84%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,839 reporting
Meets grade level66%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,839 reporting
Masters grade level26%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,839 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level89%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,696 reporting
Meets grade level67%+18 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,696 reporting
Masters grade level33%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,696 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
Approaches grade level96%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 947 reporting
Meets grade level63%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 947 reporting
Masters grade level29%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 947 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,928 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Graduation
Four-Year
100.0%+6.2 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 500 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
100.0%+6.6 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 496 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
100.0%+7.4 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 496 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.5 pts vs similar economic contextaverage forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 503 rated schools reporting
These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.
College, career and military readiness
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%+12.0 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
Criterion
This school% of graduates
Averagesimilar economic context
Differencepercentage points
Reportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria
100.0%
88.0%
+12.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 535 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
84.6%
59.1%
+25.5
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 538 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
46.2%
28.3%
+17.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 538 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)
0.0%
10.2%
−10.2
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 538 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
76.9%
34.3%
+42.6
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 538 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification
0.0%
38.0%
−38.0
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 538 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate
0.0%
1.8%
−1.8
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 538 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree
7.7%
5.8%
+1.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 538 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit
0.0%
3.9%
−3.9
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 538 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness
0.0%
3.1%
−3.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 538 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student
15.4%
7.7%
+7.7
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 538 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces
0.0%
3.4%
−3.4
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 538 rated schools reporting
Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of
meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this
school minus the average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate,
counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that
criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
210
Economically disadvantaged
58.1%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
2.4%−12.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
15.2%−3.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.7%+1.4 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
12.0%−3.6 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Aspermont Schools
African American 3.3%
Hispanic 27.1%
White 65.2%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 1.9%
Two or More Races 1.9%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,928 reporting for every category shown · 1,928 in full cohort
African American 10.2%
Hispanic 46.7%
White 36.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 2.4%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 14: Abilene · 122 reporting for every category shown · 122 in full cohort
African American 4.1%
Hispanic 36.9%
White 54.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 0.8%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,411 reporting for every category shown · 1,411 in full cohort
African American 8.7%
Hispanic 48%
White 38.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 1.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
210
Economically disadvantaged students
122
Emergent bilingual students
5
Special education students
32
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
7
Students in TEA mobility denominator
100
TEA-published mobility rate
7%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 210 students in 2025–26, an increase of 115 (121.1%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
210
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
+115
Increase · +121.1%
Change since 2021–22
+112
Increase · +114.3%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
210
Selected comparison
635
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,894 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Aspermont Schools
School year
Students enrolledAspermont Schools
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
98
First available year
640.4
2022–23
103
Increase of 5 (5.1%)
645.5
2023–24
98
Decrease of 5 (4.9%)
643.9
2024–25
95
Decrease of 3 (3.1%)
641.3
2025–26
210
Increase of 115 (121.1%)
635
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed
Rate not available
Disciplinary actions
Suppressed
Rate not available
Cumulative year-end enrollment
100
2024–25
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Aspermont Schools
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
117
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
2021–22
103
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2022–23
112
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2023–24
100
10
10.0%
13
13.00
12.8%
29.8
2024–25
100
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Aspermont Schools in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
In-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
Out-of-school suspensions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Aspermont Schools
Parent district: Aspermont ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$14,910
Selected comparison
$12,382
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,896 rated schools reporting
+$2,528 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $14,910 per student for this campus, $28,158 per student for its parent district, Aspermont ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Aspermont Schools
Parent district: Aspermont ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$9,100
$16,007
$13,054
$7,944
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,750 rated schools reporting
2019
$8,219
$15,179
$13,108
$8,111
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,770 rated schools reporting
2020
$9,651
$18,365
$14,058
$8,725
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,789 rated schools reporting
2021
$10,251
$17,611
$14,797
$9,077
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,802 rated schools reporting
2022
$13,904
$21,205
$15,708
$10,464
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,820 rated schools reporting
2023
$12,568
$19,617
$16,792
$10,987
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,844 rated schools reporting
2024
$13,234
$21,416
$18,125
$11,788
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,873 rated schools reporting
2025
$14,910
$28,158
$18,972
$12,382
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,896 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$61,426−$5,062 vs similar economic context
Teachers
21−21.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
10.1−9.1 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Aspermont Schools
Beginning 2.9%
1 to 5 years 4.3%
6 to 10 years 36.4%
11 to 20 years 46.9%
21 to 30 years 5.3%
Over 30 years 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,928 reporting for every category shown · 1,928 in full cohort
Beginning 5.9%
1 to 5 years 25.2%
6 to 10 years 19.4%
11 to 20 years 28.5%
21 to 30 years 16.3%
Over 30 years 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 14: Abilene · 122 reporting for every category shown · 122 in full cohort
Beginning 6.7%
1 to 5 years 25.9%
6 to 10 years 16.7%
11 to 20 years 27.4%
21 to 30 years 16.6%
Over 30 years 5.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 1,411 reporting for every category shown · 1,411 in full cohort
Beginning 6.6%
1 to 5 years 23.8%
6 to 10 years 17.6%
11 to 20 years 28.4%
21 to 30 years 17.6%
Over 30 years 5.3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Aspermont Schools in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classAspermont Schools · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Grade 6
13.1
17.5
Secondary English
8.4
14.8
Secondary languages other than English
4
17.3
Secondary math
11.2
15.6
Secondary science
12.5
17.1
Secondary social studies
10.5
17.1
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
Out of 160 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#1 rankings
First-place results
2 measures
1of 112
School Progress
Region 14: Abilene · of the 112 that report this measure · tied with 1
1of 112
Relative Performance
Region 14: Abilene · of the 112 that report this measure · tied with 1
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
6 measures
4of 122
Overall score
Region 14: Abilene · of the 122 that report this measure · tied with 2
4of 114
Student Achievement
Region 14: Abilene · of the 114 that report this measure · tied with 1
4of 47
Earned college credit for a dual credit course
Region 14: Abilene · of the 47 that report this measure
8of 107
Academic Growth
Region 14: Abilene · of the 107 that report this measure · tied with 1
10of 47
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course
Region 14: Abilene · of the 47 that report this measure
10of 47
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA
Region 14: Abilene · of the 47 that report this measure
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
4 measures
52of 1,827
Closing the Gaps
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,827 that report this measure · tied with 25
89of 1,848
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,848 that report this measure · tied with 14
96of 1,839
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,839 that report this measure · tied with 14
100of 1,848
Reading — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,848 that report this measure · tied with 12
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 217901001.