Districts, charter school systems & campuses · Source: Texas Education Agency
Arlon R Seay ElemA90vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Traditional public school campus
Arlon R Seay Elem
Comal County · Region 20: San Antonio · 611 students
Current score
90/1002025-26
Change
−4 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+5.7 ptsvs 84.3 average · 1,380 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
366 of 1,380tied with 70 others
Score vs region
+11.4 ptsvs 78.6 average · 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio
Region 20: San Antonio placement
82 of 650tied with 23 others
Score vs county
+3.2 ptsvs 86.8 average · 53 rated schools in Comal County
Comal County placement
17 of 53tied with 5 others
Score vs similar-size group
+9.6 ptsvs 80.4 average · 4,646 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
828 of 4,646tied with 201 others
Score vs state
+8.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
1,571 of 7,646tied with 341 others
A90
At a glance
Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 95 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 84.3 average for 1,380 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 78.6 average for 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio.The current score is above the 86.8 average for 53 rated schools in Comal County.The current score is above the 80.4 average for 4,646 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
63%vs 58.1% avg · +4.9 pts
Masters
35%vs 26.7% avg · +8.3 pts
Among 1,340 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Arlon R Seay Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84.3 average for 1,380 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 366th of 1,380 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 70 others).
Arlon R Seay Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.6 average for 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 82nd of 650 rated schools in Region 20: San Antonio (tied with 23 others).
Arlon R Seay Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 86.8 average for 53 rated schools in Comal County. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 17th of 53 rated schools in Comal County (tied with 5 others).
Arlon R Seay Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.4 average for 4,646 similarly sized rated schools. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Ranks 828th of 4,646 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 201 others).
Arlon R Seay Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 90 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. It is down 4 points since 2021-22.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 95 that year.
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement90 A+5.3 vs similar economic context · 1,340 reporting
School Progress86 B+3.5 vs similar economic context · 1,336 reporting
Closing the Gaps90 A+8.4 vs similar economic context · 1,326 reporting
Academic Growth86 B+8.2 vs similar economic context · 1,313 reporting
Relative Performance84 B+4.5 vs similar economic context · 1,336 reporting
Arlon R Seay Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,380 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
90
A
—
School Progress
86
B
4
Closing the Gaps
90
A
—
Academic Growth
86
B
4
Relative Performance
84
B
6
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (90), so
School Progress (86) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level86%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,340 reporting
Meets grade level63%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,340 reporting
Masters grade level35%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,340 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level86%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,339 reporting
Meets grade level67%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,339 reporting
Masters grade level40%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,339 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level85%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,334 reporting
Meets grade level63%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,334 reporting
Masters grade level32%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,334 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level85%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,239 reporting
Meets grade level54%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,239 reporting
Masters grade level30%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,239 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,380 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
611
Economically disadvantaged
40.3%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
25.6%+14.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
16.9%−1.2 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.8%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
10.4%−2.2 pts vs similar economic context
Student demographics
Arlon R Seay Elem
African American 1.6%
Hispanic 45.2%
White 48.2%
Asian 1.1%
Two or More Races 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,380 reporting for every category shown · 1,380 in full cohort
African American 9.3%
Hispanic 35.6%
White 45.6%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.5%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 20: San Antonio · 650 reporting for every category shown · 650 in full cohort
African American 5.2%
Hispanic 70.7%
White 19.2%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 2.9%
Selected comparison averageFor Comal County · 53 reporting for every category shown · 53 in full cohort
African American 2.8%
Hispanic 43.7%
White 47.2%
American Indian 0.2%
Asian 1.6%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.3%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,646 reporting for every category shown · 4,646 in full cohort
African American 12.2%
Hispanic 54.5%
White 24.4%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.8%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
610
Economically disadvantaged students
246
Emergent bilingual students
156
Special education students
103
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
43
Students in TEA mobility denominator
480
TEA-published mobility rate
9%
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Enrollment over time
TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.
TEA reported 611 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 12 (1.9%) from 2024–25.
Latest enrollment
611
2025–26
Change from 2024–25
−12
Decrease · −1.9%
Change since 2021–22
+176
Increase · +40.5%
Enrollment in 2025–26
This school
611
Selected comparison
690
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,348 rated schools reporting
Student enrollment by school year for Arlon R Seay Elem
School year
Students enrolledArlon R Seay Elem
Change from previous school year
Average enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22
435
First available year
694.2
2022–23
467
Increase of 32 (7.4%)
700.9
2023–24
615
Increase of 148 (31.7%)
700.9
2024–25
623
Increase of 8 (1.3%)
695.2
2025–26
611
Decrease of 12 (1.9%)
690
The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.
These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.
Discipline and removal from class
TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.
Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
17
2.6% of cumulative year-end enrollment
Disciplinary actions
47
7.32 per 100 students
Cumulative year-end enrollment
642
2024–25
Share of students · 2024–25
This school
2.6%
Selected comparison
10.7%
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,065 rated schools reporting
−8.0 pts vs similar economic context
Actions per 100 students · 2024–25
This school
7.32
Selected comparison
23.1
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,145 rated schools reporting
−15.8 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Arlon R Seay Elem
School year
Cumulative enrollment
Studentsall discipline
Students% of enrollment
Actionsall discipline
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21
427
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
2021–22
442
24
5.4%
44
9.95
10.9%
23.1
2022–23
489
19
3.9%
44
9.00
11.3%
24.5
2023–24
644
28
4.3%
43
6.68
11.1%
24.8
2024–25
642
17
2.6%
47
7.32
10.7%
23.1
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Arlon R Seay Elem in 2024–25
Category
Students
Students% of enrollment
Actions
Actionsper 100 students
Studentsselected comparison average %
Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline
17
2.6%
47
7.32
10.7%
23.1
In-school suspensions
17
2.6%
45
7.01
9.6%
17.8
Out-of-school suspensions
Suppressed
—
Suppressed
—
—
—
DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary DAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary JJAEP placements
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Mandatory expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Discretionary expulsions
Not reported
—
Not reported
—
—
—
Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.
Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.
Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.
Spending per student
The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.
Arlon R Seay Elem
Parent district: Comal ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate
Spending per student · 2025
This school
$9,374
Selected comparison
$11,975
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,351 rated schools reporting
−$2,601 vs similar economic context
For 2025, TEA reported $9,374 per student for this campus, $20,119 per student for its parent district, Comal ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.
Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.
View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
Year
Arlon R Seay Elem
Parent district: Comal ISD
Texas average
Selected comparison average
Reportingselected comparison
2018
$7,345
$14,916
$13,054
$7,796
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,238 rated schools reporting
2019
$7,496
$14,099
$13,108
$7,998
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,256 rated schools reporting
2020
$7,719
$16,438
$14,058
$8,370
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,264 rated schools reporting
2021
$8,150
$14,988
$14,797
$8,766
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,282 rated schools reporting
2022
$8,593
$14,178
$15,708
$10,110
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,299 rated schools reporting
2023
$10,611
$18,425
$16,792
$10,534
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,316 rated schools reporting
2024
$11,977
$18,904
$18,125
$11,682
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,329 rated schools reporting
2025
$9,374
$20,119
$18,972
$11,975
average forschools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,351 rated schools reporting
The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.
Teachers and actual class size
Average salary
$66,646−$751 vs similar economic context
Teachers
40−5.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.1+1.1 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Arlon R Seay Elem
1 to 5 years 21.5%
6 to 10 years 12.4%
11 to 20 years 41.3%
21 to 30 years 22.3%
Over 30 years 2.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,380 reporting for every category shown · 1,380 in full cohort
Beginning 5.3%
1 to 5 years 23.4%
6 to 10 years 19.5%
11 to 20 years 30.9%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 20: San Antonio · 650 reporting for every category shown · 650 in full cohort
Beginning 4.5%
1 to 5 years 23.5%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 31.3%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 2.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Comal County · 53 reporting for every category shown · 53 in full cohort
Beginning 4.1%
1 to 5 years 22.8%
6 to 10 years 21.4%
11 to 20 years 32.8%
21 to 30 years 15.7%
Over 30 years 1.4%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,646 reporting for every category shown · 4,646 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.4%
6 to 10 years 19.8%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 3%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Average students in a class
TEA average class size by grade or subject for Arlon R Seay Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subject
Average students per classArlon R Seay Elem · 2024–25
Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten
19.2
18.1
Grade 1
17.5
18.6
Grade 2
21.3
18.9
Grade 3
21.8
19.5
Grade 4
19
19.3
Grade 5
18.2
20.7
These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 046902110.