Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Open-enrollment charter campus

Aristoi Classical Academy-Cypress

Aristoi Classical Academy · Houston · 584 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
78/1002025-26
Change
+9 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−7.9 ptsvs 85.9 average · 53 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
46 of 53among reporting charter campuses
C78

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 69 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 85.9 average for 53 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

6.4% −5.4 pts vs 11.8%

  • 6.4% is 5.4 percentage points lower than the 11.8% average among 52 charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Aristoi Classical Academy-Cypress is rated C by TEA, scoring 78 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 85.9 average for 53 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context. It is up 9 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 46th of 53 rated charter campuses serving a similar economic context.

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas charter averageAristoi Classical Academy-Cypress 6984737678 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated Not Rated with 69 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas charter average
2025-26C7885.9 53 reporting81.7 829 reporting
2024-25C7686.8 49 reporting81.3 797 reporting
2023-24C7386.7 49 reporting79.5 776 reporting
2022-23B8487.2 47 reporting79.6 749 reporting
2021-22D6988.5 40 reporting84.5 700 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement77 C−8.8 vs similar economic context · 53 reporting
  • School Progress64 D−15.9 vs similar economic context · 51 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps81 B−2.6 vs similar economic context · 50 reporting
  • Academic Growth64 D−13.1 vs similar economic context · 50 reporting
  • Relative Performance58 F−14.5 vs similar economic context · 51 reporting
  • Aristoi Classical Academy-Cypress
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (53 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement77C3
School Progress64D6
Closing the Gaps81B9
Academic Growth64D6
Relative Performance58F2

Closest to moving up: Student Achievement, 3 points below B in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (77), so School Progress (64) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 77.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level78%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 reporting
  • Meets grade level51%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 reporting
  • Masters grade level22%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level89%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 52 reporting
  • Meets grade level65%−6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 52 reporting
  • Masters grade level30%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 52 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level69%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 52 reporting
  • Meets grade level40%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 52 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 52 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level73%−7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 50 reporting
  • Meets grade level43%−14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 50 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 50 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level79%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 reporting
  • Meets grade level42%−16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 reporting
  • Masters grade level13%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (53 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
0.0%−59.6 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter campuses reporting
Five-Year
0.0%−50.2 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter campuses reporting
Six-Year
0.0%−50.8 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter campuses reporting
Dropout Rate
0.0%−0.6 pts vs similar economic context average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 27 rated charter campuses reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only charter campuses in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported charter campus rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only charter campuses for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
584
Economically disadvantaged
19.3%+0.3 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
5.0%−7.3 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
15.4%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.7%+0.5 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
6.4%−5.4 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Aristoi Classical Academy-Cypress

African American: 6.8%Hispanic: 40.1%White: 46.9%Asian: 1.7%Pacific Islander: 0.3%Two or More Races: 4.1%
  • African American 6.8%
  • Hispanic 40.1%
  • White 46.9%
  • Asian 1.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 4.1%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 reporting for every category shown · 53 in full cohort

African American: 9.2%Hispanic: 31.8%White: 35.8%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 17.1%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 5.7%
  • African American 9.2%
  • Hispanic 31.8%
  • White 35.8%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 17.1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 5.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
584
Economically disadvantaged students
113
Emergent bilingual students
29
Special education students
90

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
33
Students in TEA mobility denominator
455
TEA-published mobility rate
7.3%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 584 students in 2025–26, an increase of 73 (14.3%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
584

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
+73

Increase · +14.3%

Change since 2021–22
+360

Increase · +160.7%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
584
Selected comparison
577

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 rated charter campuses reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Aristoi Classical Academy-Cypress
School yearStudents enrolledAristoi Classical Academy-CypressChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 224 First available year 505.6
2022–23 282 Increase of 58 (25.9%) 489.8
2023–24 433 Increase of 151 (53.5%) 525.6
2024–25 511 Increase of 78 (18.0%) 543.2
2025–26 584 Increase of 73 (14.3%) 577

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting charter campuses in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
26

4.8% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
39

7.24 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
539

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
4.8%
Selected comparison
6.1%

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 32 rated charter campuses reporting

−1.3 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
7.24
Selected comparison
9.4

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 37 rated charter campuses reporting

−2.2 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Aristoi Classical Academy-Cypress
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 102 Not reported — Not reported — — —
2021–22 243 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 304 Suppressed — 17 5.59 — 10.1
2023–24 478 30 6.3% 51 10.67 6.4% 10.9
2024–25 539 26 4.8% 39 7.24 6.1% 9.4
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Aristoi Classical Academy-Cypress in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 26 4.8% 39 7.24 6.1% 9.4
In-school suspensions 15 2.8% 17 3.15 4.6% 6.2
Out-of-school suspensions 16 3.0% 22 4.08 4.1% 6.3
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized charter campuses can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k202120232025
  • Aristoi Classical Academy-Cypress
  • Parent district: Aristoi Classical Academy
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$7,729
Selected comparison
$10,536

average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 52 rated charter campuses reporting

−$2,807 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $7,729 per student for this campus, $11,106 per student for its parent district, Aristoi Classical Academy, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearAristoi Classical Academy-CypressParent district: Aristoi Classical AcademyTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2021$17,631$10,717$14,797$8,369 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 39 rated charter campuses reporting
2022$8,058$11,324$15,708$9,134 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 41 rated charter campuses reporting
2023$9,983$11,248$16,792$10,367 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 48 rated charter campuses reporting
2024$8,121$10,579$18,125$10,302 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 50 rated charter campuses reporting
2025$7,729$11,106$18,972$10,536 average for charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 52 rated charter campuses reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$63,508+$4,996 vs similar economic context
Teachers
38+4.7 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.2−22.9 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Aristoi Classical Academy-Cypress

Beginning: 18%1 to 5 years: 42.2%6 to 10 years: 23.2%11 to 20 years: 14.1%21 to 30 years: 2.6%
  • Beginning 18%
  • 1 to 5 years 42.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 23.2%
  • 11 to 20 years 14.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 2.6%

Selected comparison average For charter campuses with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 53 reporting for every category shown · 53 in full cohort

Beginning: 11.4%1 to 5 years: 38.5%6 to 10 years: 17.4%11 to 20 years: 15.9%21 to 30 years: 6.5%Over 30 years: 0.9%
  • Beginning 11.4%
  • 1 to 5 years 38.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 17.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 15.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 6.5%
  • Over 30 years 0.9%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Aristoi Classical Academy-Cypress in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classAristoi Classical Academy-Cypress · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten22.520.5
Grade 121.221.2
Grade 22321.4
Grade 323.723.2
Grade 422.622.9
Grade 526.223
Grade 62421.2
Secondary English23.715.8
Secondary languages other than English17.216.6
Secondary math11.814.4
Secondary science2417.9
Secondary social studies23.717.6

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 12 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101803002.