Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Anthony HS

El Paso County · Region 19: El Paso · 235 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
88/1002025-26
Change
±0 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+9.1 ptsvs 78.9 average · 2,036 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
365 of 2,036tied with 54 others
B88

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is flat; under the rules in force back then it scored 87 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 78.9 average for 2,036 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 11 points

77 to 88 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 88 is 9.1 points above the 78.9 average among 2,036 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 16 points

71 to 87 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 87 is 10.9 points above the 76.1 average among 1,883 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

School Progress above the similar-context average

89 +9 pts vs 80

  • 89 is 9 points above the 80 average among 1,895 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Anthony HS is rated B by TEA, scoring 88 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 78.9 average for 2,036 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is unchanged since 2021-22.

Ranks 365th of 2,036 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 54 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageAnthony HS 8874847788 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 87 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8878.9 2,036 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7778.5 2,019 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8476.4 2,005 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7476.9 1,979 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8881.9 1,959 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement84 B+8.6 vs similar economic context · 1,902 reporting
  • School Progress89 B+9.0 vs similar economic context · 1,895 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps87 B+10.9 vs similar economic context · 1,883 reporting
  • Academic Growth56 F−17.1 vs similar economic context · 1,839 reporting
  • Relative Performance89 B+10.6 vs similar economic context · 1,895 reporting
  • Anthony HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,036 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement84B6
School Progress89B1
Closing the Gaps87B3
Academic Growth56F4
Relative Performance89B1

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 1 point below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (89), so Student Achievement (84) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 89.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level87%+16 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,902 reporting
  • Meets grade level55%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,902 reporting
  • Masters grade level13%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,902 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level76%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 reporting
  • Meets grade level53%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 reporting
  • Masters grade level7%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,900 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level96%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,891 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%+4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,891 reporting
  • Masters grade level4%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,891 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level91%+20 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,745 reporting
  • Meets grade level56%+14 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,745 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,745 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level98%+27 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 873 reporting
  • Meets grade level67%+24 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 873 reporting
  • Masters grade level30%+11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 873 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,036 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
94.8%+1.2 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 415 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
96.6%+3.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 414 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
96.2%+4.0 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 413 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.8%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 418 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
89.0%+2.4 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria89.0%86.6%+2.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 453 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course67.9%59.2%+8.7 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 457 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA20.8%26.2%−5.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 457 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)15.1%11.3%+3.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 457 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course7.5%32.8%−25.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 457 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification32.1%36.6%−4.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 457 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%2.3%−2.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 457 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%7.5%−7.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 457 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit0.0%4.4%−4.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 457 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness1.9%3.3%−1.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 457 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student5.7%8.3%−2.6 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 457 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces1.9%3.0%−1.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 457 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
60

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
17

28.3% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
40

66.7% of graduates

Not trackable
3

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
60
Selected comparison
248.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
17
Selected comparison
107

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
28.3%
Selected comparison
43.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting

−14.7 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
66.7%
Selected comparison
51.2%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting

+15.5 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
5.0%
Selected comparison
5.8%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 376 rated schools reporting

−0.8 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. EL PASO COMMUNITY COLLEGE DIST (010387)9
  2. U. OF TEXAS AT EL PASO (003661)8

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
235
Economically disadvantaged
71.9%−0.1 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
23.0%+1.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
14.9%−3.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.5%−0.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
22.3%+4.1 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Anthony HS

Hispanic: 96.6%White: 2.6%Two or More Races: 0.9%
  • Hispanic 96.6%
  • White 2.6%
  • Two or More Races 0.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,036 reporting for every category shown · 2,036 in full cohort

African American: 12.6%Hispanic: 58.8%White: 22.8%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.3%
  • African American 12.6%
  • Hispanic 58.8%
  • White 22.8%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.3%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
235
Economically disadvantaged students
169
Emergent bilingual students
54
Special education students
35

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
30
Students in TEA mobility denominator
259
TEA-published mobility rate
11.6%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 235 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 8 (3.3%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
235

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−8

Decrease · −3.3%

Change since 2021–22
+3

Increase · +1.3%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
235
Selected comparison
636

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,004 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Anthony HS
School yearStudents enrolledAnthony HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 232 First available year 651.8
2022–23 236 Increase of 4 (1.7%) 656.5
2023–24 247 Increase of 11 (4.7%) 654.7
2024–25 243 Decrease of 4 (1.6%) 652.6
2025–26 235 Decrease of 8 (3.3%) 636

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
60

23.2% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
93

35.91 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
259

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
23.2%
Selected comparison
13.1%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,547 rated schools reporting

+10.1 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
35.91
Selected comparison
31.2

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,659 rated schools reporting

+4.7 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Anthony HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 243 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 252 35 13.9% 53 21.03 12.9% 30.7
2022–23 250 55 22.0% 97 38.80 13.5% 32.8
2023–24 260 44 16.9% 76 29.23 13.4% 32.6
2024–25 259 60 23.2% 93 35.91 13.1% 31.2
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Anthony HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 60 23.2% 93 35.91 13.1% 31.2
In-school suspensions 54 20.9% 66 25.48 11.7% 23.5
Out-of-school suspensions 10 3.9% 14 5.41 7.5% 11.3
DAEP placements 10 3.9% 13 5.02 5.3% 6.4
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$14k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Anthony HS
  • Parent district: Anthony ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$13,002
Selected comparison
$13,126

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,018 rated schools reporting

−$124 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $13,002 per student for this campus, $19,285 per student for its parent district, Anthony ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearAnthony HSParent district: Anthony ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$11,200$12,214$13,054$8,042 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,885 rated schools reporting
2019$12,202$14,351$13,108$8,183 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,904 rated schools reporting
2020$12,048$14,555$14,058$8,735 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,924 rated schools reporting
2021$11,826$14,567$14,797$9,258 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,937 rated schools reporting
2022$11,326$15,796$15,708$10,538 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,960 rated schools reporting
2023$11,666$17,302$16,792$11,240 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,981 rated schools reporting
2024$12,146$18,565$18,125$12,371 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,004 rated schools reporting
2025$13,002$19,285$18,972$13,126 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,018 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$74,526+$8,029 vs similar economic context
Teachers
20−23.0 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
11.7−2.3 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Anthony HS

1 to 5 years: 34.3%6 to 10 years: 21.9%11 to 20 years: 29.9%21 to 30 years: 10%Over 30 years: 4%
  • 1 to 5 years 34.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 21.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 29.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 10%
  • Over 30 years 4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,036 reporting for every category shown · 2,036 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.7%1 to 5 years: 27%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.3%21 to 30 years: 15.3%Over 30 years: 3.9%
  • Beginning 6.7%
  • 1 to 5 years 27%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 15.3%
  • Over 30 years 3.9%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Anthony HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classAnthony HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English15.815.3
Secondary languages other than English14.717.9
Secondary math14.116.2
Secondary science19.117.6
Secondary social studies16.317.4

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#1 rankings

First-place results

1 measure

  • 1of 200

    Math — Approaches

    Region 19: El Paso · of the 200 that report this measure · tied with 1

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

1 measure

  • 10of 39

    Six-Year Graduation Rate

    El Paso County (standard accountability only) · of the 39 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 071906001.