Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Ann M Garcia-Enriquez MS

El Paso County · Region 19: El Paso · 394 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
85/1002025-26
Change
−3 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+7.3 ptsvs 77.7 average · 1,827 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
493 of 1,827tied with 66 others
B85

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 85 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.7 average for 1,827 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

School Progress rose 3 points

82 to 85 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 85 is 6.1 points above the 78.9 average among 1,693 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
44%vs 39.1% avg · +4.9 pts
Masters
21%vs 15.1% avg · +5.9 pts

Among 1,693 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
44%vs 33.6% avg · +10.4 pts
Masters
16%vs 13.9% avg · +2.1 pts

Among 1,601 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Ann M Garcia-Enriquez MS is rated B by TEA, scoring 85 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.7 average for 1,827 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 3 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 493rd of 1,827 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 66 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageAnn M Garcia-Enriquez MS 8879668585 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 85 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8577.7 1,827 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8577.5 1,810 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24D6673.9 1,794 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7973.3 1,790 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8882.0 1,768 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement73 C+2.7 vs similar economic context · 1,696 reporting
  • School Progress85 B+6.1 vs similar economic context · 1,693 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps84 B+8.9 vs similar economic context · 1,684 reporting
  • Academic Growth81 B+7.6 vs similar economic context · 1,671 reporting
  • Relative Performance85 B+8.1 vs similar economic context · 1,692 reporting
  • Ann M Garcia-Enriquez MS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,827 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement73C7
School Progress85B5
Closing the Gaps84B6
Academic Growth81B9
Relative Performance85B5

Closest to moving up: School Progress, 5 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (85), so Student Achievement (73) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 85.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level67%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,696 reporting
  • Meets grade level39%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,696 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,696 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level75%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,696 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%±0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,696 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,696 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level69%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,693 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%+5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,693 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,693 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level72%+9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,601 reporting
  • Meets grade level44%+10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,601 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,601 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level45%−17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 527 reporting
  • Meets grade level15%−19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 527 reporting
  • Masters grade level4%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 527 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,827 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
394
Economically disadvantaged
94.9%+2.8 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
57.6%+15.7 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
16.5%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.2%+1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
19.2%−4.2 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Ann M Garcia-Enriquez MS

Hispanic: 100%
  • Hispanic 100%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,827 reporting for every category shown · 1,827 in full cohort

African American: 14.9%Hispanic: 77.3%White: 4.8%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.2%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 1.4%
  • African American 14.9%
  • Hispanic 77.3%
  • White 4.8%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.2%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 1.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
394
Economically disadvantaged students
374
Emergent bilingual students
227
Special education students
65

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
37
Students in TEA mobility denominator
428
TEA-published mobility rate
8.6%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 394 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 14 (3.4%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
394

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−14

Decrease · −3.4%

Change since 2021–22
−125

Decrease · −24.1%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
394
Selected comparison
561.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,808 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Ann M Garcia-Enriquez MS
School yearStudents enrolledAnn M Garcia-Enriquez MSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 519 First available year 609.6
2022–23 496 Decrease of 23 (4.4%) 605.8
2023–24 418 Decrease of 78 (15.7%) 595.6
2024–25 408 Decrease of 10 (2.4%) 588.7
2025–26 394 Decrease of 14 (3.4%) 561.8

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
92

21.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
188

43.93 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
428

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
21.5%
Selected comparison
13.1%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,069 rated schools reporting

+8.4 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
43.93
Selected comparison
30.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,159 rated schools reporting

+13.0 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Ann M Garcia-Enriquez MS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 533 10 1.9% 11 2.06 6.8% 13
2021–22 553 131 23.7% 256 46.29 12.5% 29.7
2022–23 526 160 30.4% 353 67.11 13.6% 32.8
2023–24 453 132 29.1% 332 73.29 13.7% 33
2024–25 428 92 21.5% 188 43.93 13.1% 30.9
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Ann M Garcia-Enriquez MS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 92 21.5% 188 43.93 13.1% 30.9
In-school suspensions 90 21.0% 165 38.55 11.4% 21.9
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements 15 3.5% 17 3.97 5.1% 6.2
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Ann M Garcia-Enriquez MS
  • Parent district: San Elizario ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$13,537
Selected comparison
$13,276

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,809 rated schools reporting

+$262 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $13,537 per student for this campus, $15,903 per student for its parent district, San Elizario ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearAnn M Garcia-Enriquez MSParent district: San Elizario ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$10,226$13,420$13,054$8,359 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,724 rated schools reporting
2019$10,357$12,669$13,108$8,372 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,748 rated schools reporting
2020$9,456$12,834$14,058$8,868 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,751 rated schools reporting
2021$9,654$13,163$14,797$9,712 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,753 rated schools reporting
2022$11,238$14,690$15,708$11,228 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,769 rated schools reporting
2023$13,196$16,209$16,792$11,864 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,790 rated schools reporting
2024$14,211$17,584$18,125$12,725 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,798 rated schools reporting
2025$13,537$15,903$18,972$13,276 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,809 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$86,851+$18,365 vs similar economic context
Teachers
25−14.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
15.6+0.9 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Ann M Garcia-Enriquez MS

1 to 5 years: 16.6%6 to 10 years: 36%11 to 20 years: 27.7%21 to 30 years: 19.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 16.6%
  • 6 to 10 years 36%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 19.8%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,827 reporting for every category shown · 1,827 in full cohort

Beginning: 7.6%1 to 5 years: 27%6 to 10 years: 18.7%11 to 20 years: 27.1%21 to 30 years: 14.9%Over 30 years: 3.5%
  • Beginning 7.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 27%
  • 6 to 10 years 18.7%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.1%
  • 21 to 30 years 14.9%
  • Over 30 years 3.5%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Ann M Garcia-Enriquez MS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classAnn M Garcia-Enriquez MS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English9.215.1
Secondary languages other than English16.518.2
Secondary math21.116.8
Secondary science23.617.7
Secondary social studies22.317.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 071904041.