Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Anderson Elem

Harris County · Region 04: Houston · 585 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
83/1002025-26
Change
−14 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
+5.2 ptsvs 77.8 average · 2,139 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
668 of 2,139tied with 77 others
B83

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 92 in 2021-22. The current score is above the 77.8 average for 2,139 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent movement

Overall score rose 16 points

67 to 83 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 83 is 5.2 points above the 77.8 average among 2,139 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 16 points

70 to 86 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 86 is 11 points above the 75 average among 1,957 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

School Progress above the similar-context average

82 +3 pts vs 79

  • 82 is 3 points above the 79 average among 1,971 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Anderson Elem is rated B by TEA, scoring 83 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 77.8 average for 2,139 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 14 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 668th of 2,139 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 77 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
9080706050 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageAnderson Elem 9758676783 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated A with 92 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26B8377.8 2,139 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25D6777.5 2,127 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24D6775.0 2,111 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23F5875.5 2,094 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22A9781.6 2,076 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement69 D−3.8 vs similar economic context · 1,977 reporting
  • School Progress82 B+3.0 vs similar economic context · 1,971 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps86 B+11.0 vs similar economic context · 1,957 reporting
  • Academic Growth82 B+9.7 vs similar economic context · 1,922 reporting
  • Relative Performance72 C−5.4 vs similar economic context · 1,971 reporting
  • Anderson Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,139 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement69D1
School Progress82B8
Closing the Gaps86B4
Academic Growth82B8
Relative Performance72C8

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 4 points below A in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (82), so Student Achievement (69) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 82.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level65%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,977 reporting
  • Meets grade level41%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,977 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,977 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level70%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,975 reporting
  • Meets grade level46%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,975 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,975 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level64%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,966 reporting
  • Meets grade level38%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,966 reporting
  • Masters grade level13%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,966 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level52%−15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,821 reporting
  • Meets grade level30%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,821 reporting
  • Masters grade level11%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,821 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (2,139 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
585
Economically disadvantaged
79.0%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
29.2%+1.4 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
17.4%−1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
93.4%±0.0 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
22.7%+2.4 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Anderson Elem

African American: 25.1%Hispanic: 60.7%White: 9.4%Asian: 1%Pacific Islander: 0.9%Two or More Races: 2.9%
  • African American 25.1%
  • Hispanic 60.7%
  • White 9.4%
  • Asian 1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.9%
  • Two or More Races 2.9%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,139 reporting for every category shown · 2,139 in full cohort

African American: 14%Hispanic: 66.4%White: 14.7%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 1.7%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 2.7%
  • African American 14%
  • Hispanic 66.4%
  • White 14.7%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 1.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 2.7%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
585
Economically disadvantaged students
462
Emergent bilingual students
171
Special education students
102

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
95
Students in TEA mobility denominator
528
TEA-published mobility rate
18%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 585 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 50 (7.9%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
585

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−50

Decrease · −7.9%

Change since 2021–22
+102

Increase · +21.1%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
585
Selected comparison
635.1

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,108 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Anderson Elem
School yearStudents enrolledAnderson ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 483 First available year 657.5
2022–23 501 Increase of 18 (3.7%) 661.7
2023–24 691 Increase of 190 (37.9%) 656.9
2024–25 635 Decrease of 56 (8.1%) 653.1
2025–26 585 Decrease of 50 (7.9%) 635.1

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
46

6.5% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
79

11.19 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
706

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
6.5%
Selected comparison
13.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,588 rated schools reporting

−6.9 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
11.19
Selected comparison
32.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,693 rated schools reporting

−21.3 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Anderson Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 532 12 2.3% 30 5.64 8.6% 17
2021–22 534 16 3.0% 32 5.99 12.9% 31.1
2022–23 550 27 4.9% 57 10.36 13.7% 34.1
2023–24 752 34 4.5% 79 10.51 13.7% 34
2024–25 706 46 6.5% 79 11.19 13.4% 32.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Anderson Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 46 6.5% 79 11.19 13.4% 32.5
In-school suspensions 43 6.1% 69 9.77 11.7% 23.6
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Anderson Elem
  • Parent district: Spring ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,853
Selected comparison
$13,045

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,126 rated schools reporting

−$3,192 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,853 per student for this campus, $18,440 per student for its parent district, Spring ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearAnderson ElemParent district: Spring ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$8,638$12,612$13,054$8,098 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,010 rated schools reporting
2019$7,531$15,637$13,108$8,236 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,030 rated schools reporting
2020$8,084$15,486$14,058$8,748 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,046 rated schools reporting
2021$9,774$14,638$14,797$9,382 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,059 rated schools reporting
2022$10,174$14,042$15,708$10,731 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,077 rated schools reporting
2023$10,353$15,536$16,792$11,241 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,094 rated schools reporting
2024$9,596$17,211$18,125$12,259 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,111 rated schools reporting
2025$9,853$18,440$18,972$13,045 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,126 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$67,822+$874 vs similar economic context
Teachers
46+2.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.8−1.2 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Anderson Elem

Beginning: 8.8%1 to 5 years: 39.5%6 to 10 years: 24.1%11 to 20 years: 17.5%21 to 30 years: 10.1%
  • Beginning 8.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 39.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 24.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 17.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 10.1%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 2,139 reporting for every category shown · 2,139 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.9%1 to 5 years: 27.7%6 to 10 years: 19%11 to 20 years: 27.2%21 to 30 years: 15%Over 30 years: 3.6%
  • Beginning 6.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 27.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 19%
  • 11 to 20 years 27.2%
  • 21 to 30 years 15%
  • Over 30 years 3.6%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Anderson Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classAnderson Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten19.518
Grade 119.718.4
Grade 21918.4
Grade 318.718.9
Grade 418.819.1
Grade 521.420

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 101919109.