Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Alkek Elem

Bandera County · Region 20: San Antonio · 530 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
65/1002025-26
Change
−6 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−16.1 ptsvs 81.1 average · 1,875 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,793 of 1,875tied with 14 others
D65

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 68 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 81.1 average for 1,875 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

8% −7.3 pts vs 15.3%

  • 8% is 7.3 percentage points lower than the 15.3% average among 1,818 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Current strength

Attendance above the similar-context average

95.5% +1.1 pts vs 94.4%

  • 95.5% is 1.1 percentage points above the 94.4% average among 1,818 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Alkek Elem is rated D by TEA, scoring 65 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 81.1 average for 1,875 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 6 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,793rd of 1,875 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 14 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. Official improvement and transfer notices
  3. 5 years of ratings
  4. Where the score comes from
  5. Student outcomes
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this comes from

Official improvement and transfer notices

Official state and federal designations can carry support, reporting requirements or a family transfer option that a single A–F rating does not explain.

2026 federal improvement status

Comprehensive Support and Improvement

Official support label: Comprehensive Identified

Identification reason: CSI Low Performance

TEA track year 1 · Title I campus

Open the official TEA list and methodology

Schools identified for improvement

This school
Listed
Selected comparison
22.7%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,875 rated schools reporting

Schools on the PEG list

This school
Not listed
Selected comparison
1.5%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,875 rated schools reporting

Selected comparison percentages are the share of reporting schools in that group found on each dated list. They are neutral prevalence context; changing the comparison never changes this school's official status.

These are dated TEA statuses, fetched 24 August 2026; they are not added to or subtracted from this site's rating.

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageAlkek Elem 7176757965 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated Not Rated with 68 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26D6581.1 1,875 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25C7981.2 1,848 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7579.1 1,822 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7679.8 1,791 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7182.7 1,764 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement70 C−10.2 vs similar economic context · 1,803 reporting
  • School Progress70 C−11.3 vs similar economic context · 1,795 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps54 F−24.3 vs similar economic context · 1,779 reporting
  • Academic Growth70 C−4.7 vs similar economic context · 1,747 reporting
  • Relative Performance63 D−16.4 vs similar economic context · 1,795 reporting
  • Alkek Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,875 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement70C10
School Progress70C10
Closing the Gaps54F6
Academic Growth70C10
Relative Performance63D7

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 6 points below D in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level64%−12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,803 reporting
  • Meets grade level41%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,803 reporting
  • Masters grade level18%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,803 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level67%−11 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,800 reporting
  • Meets grade level43%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,800 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%−2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,800 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level60%−13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,790 reporting
  • Meets grade level37%−8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,790 reporting
  • Masters grade level15%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,790 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level68%−9 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,650 reporting
  • Meets grade level45%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,650 reporting
  • Masters grade level20%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,650 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,875 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
530
Economically disadvantaged
56.1%−0.5 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
10.0%−4.5 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
24.6%+5.8 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.5%+1.1 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
8.0%−7.3 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Alkek Elem

African American: 0.4%Hispanic: 43.4%White: 53.2%Two or More Races: 3%
  • African American 0.4%
  • Hispanic 43.4%
  • White 53.2%
  • Two or More Races 3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,875 reporting for every category shown · 1,875 in full cohort

African American: 9.9%Hispanic: 45.3%White: 37.8%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.5%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4%
  • African American 9.9%
  • Hispanic 45.3%
  • White 37.8%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.5%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
528
Economically disadvantaged students
296
Emergent bilingual students
53
Special education students
130

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
60
Students in TEA mobility denominator
477
TEA-published mobility rate
12.6%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 530 students in 2025–26, a decrease of 44 (7.7%) from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
530

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
−44

Decrease · −7.7%

Change since 2021–22
−100

Decrease · −15.9%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
530
Selected comparison
635.4

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,835 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Alkek Elem
School yearStudents enrolledAlkek ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 630 First available year 639.4
2022–23 630 No change 645.8
2023–24 616 Decrease of 14 (2.2%) 644.3
2024–25 574 Decrease of 42 (6.8%) 641.2
2025–26 530 Decrease of 44 (7.7%) 635.4

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
32

5.3% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
53

8.79 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
603

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
5.3%
Selected comparison
12.5%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,439 rated schools reporting

−7.2 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
8.79
Selected comparison
28

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,559 rated schools reporting

−19.2 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Alkek Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 642 26 4.0% 42 6.54 9.7% 18.7
2021–22 690 37 5.4% 60 8.70 12.4% 28
2022–23 658 25 3.8% 74 11.25 12.9% 29.7
2023–24 653 36 5.5% 58 8.88 12.8% 29.8
2024–25 603 32 5.3% 53 8.79 12.5% 28
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Alkek Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 32 5.3% 53 8.79 12.5% 28
In-school suspensions 32 5.3% 52 8.62 11.3% 21.8
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$4k$12k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Alkek Elem
  • Parent district: Bandera ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$8,071
Selected comparison
$12,298

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,845 rated schools reporting

−$4,227 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $8,071 per student for this campus, $15,816 per student for its parent district, Bandera ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearAlkek ElemParent district: Bandera ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$4,891$10,003$13,054$7,931 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,697 rated schools reporting
2019$5,399$10,333$13,108$8,094 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,715 rated schools reporting
2020$5,356$11,160$14,058$8,678 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,734 rated schools reporting
2021$6,303$11,394$14,797$9,055 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,749 rated schools reporting
2022$5,595$11,164$15,708$10,474 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,766 rated schools reporting
2023$5,903$12,651$16,792$10,978 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,791 rated schools reporting
2024$7,054$14,241$18,125$11,799 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,819 rated schools reporting
2025$8,071$15,816$18,972$12,298 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,845 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$75,389+$8,857 vs similar economic context
Teachers
37−5.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.3−5.1 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Alkek Elem

Beginning: 4.3%1 to 5 years: 12.2%6 to 10 years: 9.8%11 to 20 years: 41.8%21 to 30 years: 29.3%Over 30 years: 2.4%
  • Beginning 4.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 12.2%
  • 6 to 10 years 9.8%
  • 11 to 20 years 41.8%
  • 21 to 30 years 29.3%
  • Over 30 years 2.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,875 reporting for every category shown · 1,875 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.8%1 to 5 years: 24.9%6 to 10 years: 19.4%11 to 20 years: 28.7%21 to 30 years: 16.4%Over 30 years: 4.4%
  • Beginning 5.8%
  • 1 to 5 years 24.9%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.4%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.4%
  • Over 30 years 4.4%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Alkek Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classAlkek Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten20.318
Grade 119.818.2
Grade 216.918.4
Grade 316.618.8
Grade 41819
Grade 516.319.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 010902101.