Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Alice Deanne Fagert Elem

Fort Bend County · Region 04: Houston · 740 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
95/1002025-26
Score vs similar economic context
+11.1 ptsvs 83.9 average · 1,415 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
52 of 1,415tied with 25 others
A95

At a glance

The current score is above the 83.9 average for 1,415 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

STAAR result

All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
79%vs 57.5% avg · +21.5 pts
Masters
51%vs 26.3% avg · +24.7 pts

Among 1,373 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Math above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
77%vs 51.1% avg · +25.9 pts
Masters
47%vs 21.8% avg · +25.2 pts

Among 1,367 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

STAAR result

Reading above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
83%vs 62.4% avg · +20.6 pts
Masters
59%vs 27.9% avg · +31.1 pts

Among 1,372 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Alice Deanne Fagert Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.9 average for 1,415 rated schools serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.

Ranks 52nd of 1,415 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 25 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 1 year of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Teachers
  8. Where this school ranks best
  9. Where this comes from

1 year of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 95 2025-26

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9583.9 1,415 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement94 A+9.7 vs similar economic context · 1,373 reporting
  • School Progress92 A+9.7 vs similar economic context · 1,369 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps96 A+14.7 vs similar economic context · 1,359 reporting
  • Academic Growth92 A+14.5 vs similar economic context · 1,345 reporting
  • Relative Performance92 A+12.6 vs similar economic context · 1,369 reporting
  • Alice Deanne Fagert Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,415 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement94A—
School Progress92A—
Closing the Gaps96A—
Academic Growth92A—
Relative Performance92A—

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (94), so School Progress (92) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 94.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level93%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,373 reporting
  • Meets grade level79%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,373 reporting
  • Masters grade level51%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,373 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level97%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,372 reporting
  • Meets grade level83%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,372 reporting
  • Masters grade level59%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,372 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level91%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,367 reporting
  • Meets grade level77%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,367 reporting
  • Masters grade level47%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,367 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level88%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,267 reporting
  • Meets grade level68%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,267 reporting
  • Masters grade level41%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,267 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,415 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
740
Economically disadvantaged
41.1%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
34.6%+23.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
16.3%−1.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—

Student demographics

Alice Deanne Fagert Elem

African American: 29.9%Hispanic: 25.4%White: 20.8%American Indian: 0.1%Asian: 19.1%Pacific Islander: 0.3%Two or More Races: 4.5%
  • African American 29.9%
  • Hispanic 25.4%
  • White 20.8%
  • American Indian 0.1%
  • Asian 19.1%
  • Pacific Islander 0.3%
  • Two or More Races 4.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,415 reporting for every category shown · 1,415 in full cohort

African American: 9.3%Hispanic: 36.1%White: 45.3%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 4.4%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 4.4%
  • African American 9.3%
  • Hispanic 36.1%
  • White 45.3%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 4.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 4.4%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
737
Economically disadvantaged students
303
Emergent bilingual students
255
Special education students
120

TEA context labels

  • New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Teachers

Average salary
$76,753+$9,405 vs similar economic context
Teachers
50+4.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.7+0.7 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Alice Deanne Fagert Elem

Beginning: 6%1 to 5 years: 28.1%6 to 10 years: 20%11 to 20 years: 33.9%21 to 30 years: 12%
  • Beginning 6%
  • 1 to 5 years 28.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 20%
  • 11 to 20 years 33.9%
  • 21 to 30 years 12%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,415 reporting for every category shown · 1,415 in full cohort

Beginning: 5.3%1 to 5 years: 23.5%6 to 10 years: 19.5%11 to 20 years: 30.7%21 to 30 years: 17%Over 30 years: 3.8%
  • Beginning 5.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.5%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 30.7%
  • 21 to 30 years 17%
  • Over 30 years 3.8%

Where this school ranks best

Out of 90 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#2–3 rankings

Second- and third-place results

1 measure

  • 2of 136

    Closing the Gaps

    Fort Bend County · of the 136 that report this measure · tied with 1

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

2 measures

  • 5of 136

    Reading — Approaches

    Fort Bend County · of the 136 that report this measure

  • 10of 136

    Reading — Masters

    Fort Bend County · of the 136 that report this measure · tied with 1

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

9 measures

  • 20of 1,373

    All Subjects — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,373 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 26of 1,345

    Academic Growth

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,345 that report this measure · tied with 25

  • 35of 1,367

    Math — Masters

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,367 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 38of 1,372

    Reading — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,372 that report this measure · tied with 5

  • 43of 1,373

    All Subjects — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,373 that report this measure · tied with 8

  • 43of 1,367

    Math — Meets

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,367 that report this measure · tied with 10

  • 52of 1,415

    Overall score

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,415 that report this measure · tied with 25

  • 64of 1,373

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,373 that report this measure · tied with 19

  • 119of 4,006

    Relative Performance

    Similar size · of the 4,006 that report this measure · tied with 69

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 079901153.