+11.1 ptsvs 83.9 average · 1,415 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
52 of 1,415tied with 25 others
Score vs region
+11.7 ptsvs 83.3 average · 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston
Region 04: Houston placement
58 of 1,303tied with 27 others
Score vs county
+11.0 ptsvs 84 average · 140 rated schools in Fort Bend County
Fort Bend County placement
5 of 140tied with 4 others
Score vs similar-size group
+14.3 ptsvs 80.7 average · 4,111 similarly sized rated schools
Similar size placement
83 of 4,111tied with 57 others
Score vs state
+13.7 ptsvs 81.3 average · 7,646 rated Texas schools
Texas placement
247 of 7,646tied with 131 others
A95
At a glance
The current score is above the 83.9 average for 1,415 rated schools serving a similar economic context.The current score is above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston.The current score is above the 84 average for 140 rated schools in Fort Bend County.The current score is above the 80.7 average for 4,111 similarly sized rated schools.The current score is above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools.
Evidence worth noticing
Strengths and momentum
STAAR result
All Subjects above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters
Meets
79%vs 57.5% avg · +21.5 pts
Masters
51%vs 26.3% avg · +24.7 pts
Among 1,373 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
A precomputed strengths set is not available for this pinned entity. The page’s direct numeric comparisons still update to that pin.
Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.
Read the full rating context and placement
Alice Deanne Fagert Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.9 average for 1,415 rated schools serving a similar economic context. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 52nd of 1,415 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 25 others).
Alice Deanne Fagert Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 83.3 average for 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 58th of 1,303 rated schools in Region 04: Houston (tied with 27 others).
Alice Deanne Fagert Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 84 average for 140 rated schools in Fort Bend County. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 5th of 140 rated schools in Fort Bend County (tied with 4 others).
Alice Deanne Fagert Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 80.7 average for 4,111 similarly sized rated schools. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Ranks 83rd of 4,111 similarly sized rated schools (tied with 57 others).
Alice Deanne Fagert Elem is rated A by TEA, scoring 95 out of 100 for 2025-26 — above the 81.3 average for 7,646 rated Texas schools. TEA has published 1 year of scores for this school, so there is no trend to read yet.
Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.
Compare against
Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.
Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.
Student Achievement94 A+9.7 vs similar economic context · 1,373 reporting
School Progress92 A+9.7 vs similar economic context · 1,369 reporting
Closing the Gaps96 A+14.7 vs similar economic context · 1,359 reporting
Academic Growth92 A+14.5 vs similar economic context · 1,345 reporting
Relative Performance92 A+12.6 vs similar economic context · 1,369 reporting
Alice Deanne Fagert Elem
Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,415 in cohort)
Domain scores
Domain
Score
Grade
Points to next grade
Student Achievement
94
A
—
School Progress
92
A
—
Closing the Gaps
96
A
—
Academic Growth
92
A
—
Relative Performance
92
A
—
TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student
Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (94), so
School Progress (92) is published above but does not enter the overall
score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 94.
Student outcomes
STAAR performance
All Subjects
Approaches grade level93%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,373 reporting
Meets grade level79%+22 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,373 reporting
Masters grade level51%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,373 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
Approaches grade level97%+15 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,372 reporting
Meets grade level83%+21 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,372 reporting
Masters grade level59%+31 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,372 reporting
Math3 performance levels
Approaches grade level91%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,367 reporting
Meets grade level77%+26 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,367 reporting
Masters grade level47%+25 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,367 reporting
Science3 performance levels
Approaches grade level88%+7 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,267 reporting
Meets grade level68%+12 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,267 reporting
Masters grade level41%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,267 reporting
Approaches grade level
Meets grade level
Masters grade level
Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,415 in cohort)
Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.
Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.
Who this school serves
Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.
Students
740
Economically disadvantaged
41.1%−1.0 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
34.6%+23.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
16.3%−1.9 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
—
Chronically absent
—
Student demographics
Alice Deanne Fagert Elem
African American 29.9%
Hispanic 25.4%
White 20.8%
American Indian 0.1%
Asian 19.1%
Pacific Islander 0.3%
Two or More Races 4.5%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,415 reporting for every category shown · 1,415 in full cohort
African American 9.3%
Hispanic 36.1%
White 45.3%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.4%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 4.4%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
African American 19.1%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 16.9%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 6.7%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.1%
Selected comparison averageFor Fort Bend County · 140 reporting for every category shown · 140 in full cohort
African American 26.7%
Hispanic 34.3%
White 15.3%
American Indian 0.5%
Asian 19%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,111 reporting for every category shown · 4,111 in full cohort
African American 12.4%
Hispanic 53.8%
White 24.2%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 5.5%
Pacific Islander 0.2%
Two or More Races 3.6%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
African American 11.5%
Hispanic 52.6%
White 27.8%
American Indian 0.3%
Asian 4.2%
Pacific Islander 0.1%
Two or More Races 3.4%
Student counts behind the percentages
Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.
Students in this TEA accountability summary
737
Economically disadvantaged students
303
Emergent bilingual students
255
Special education students
120
TEA context labels
New campus compared with last year’s fall enrollment
Campus mobility · 2024–25
Mobile students
Not reported
Students in TEA mobility denominator
Not reported
TEA-published mobility rate
Not reported
The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.
The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.
Teachers
Average salary
$76,753+$9,405 vs similar economic context
Teachers
50+4.2 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.7+0.7 vs similar economic context
Teaching experience
Alice Deanne Fagert Elem
Beginning 6%
1 to 5 years 28.1%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 33.9%
21 to 30 years 12%
Selected comparison averageFor schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,415 reporting for every category shown · 1,415 in full cohort
Beginning 5.3%
1 to 5 years 23.5%
6 to 10 years 19.5%
11 to 20 years 30.7%
21 to 30 years 17%
Over 30 years 3.8%
Selected comparison averageFor Region 04: Houston · 1,303 reporting for every category shown · 1,303 in full cohort
Beginning 7.7%
1 to 5 years 27.3%
6 to 10 years 20.6%
11 to 20 years 27.2%
21 to 30 years 13.5%
Over 30 years 2.6%
Selected comparison averageFor Fort Bend County · 140 reporting for every category shown · 140 in full cohort
Beginning 5.7%
1 to 5 years 23.9%
6 to 10 years 21.9%
11 to 20 years 30.1%
21 to 30 years 15.4%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Selected comparison averageFor similarly sized schools · 4,111 reporting for every category shown · 4,111 in full cohort
Beginning 6.1%
1 to 5 years 26.6%
6 to 10 years 20%
11 to 20 years 29%
21 to 30 years 15.1%
Over 30 years 2.9%
Statewide average7,646 reporting for every category shown · 7,646 Texas schools in full cohort
Beginning 6.2%
1 to 5 years 25.6%
6 to 10 years 19.2%
11 to 20 years 28.7%
21 to 30 years 15.9%
Over 30 years 3.7%
Where this school ranks best
Out of 90 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.
#2–3 rankings
Second- and third-place results
1 measure
2of 136
Closing the Gaps
Fort Bend County · of the 136 that report this measure · tied with 1
#4–10 rankings
Fourth- through tenth-place results
2 measures
5of 136
Reading — Approaches
Fort Bend County · of the 136 that report this measure
10of 136
Reading — Masters
Fort Bend County · of the 136 that report this measure · tied with 1
Other top-5% rankings
High placements in larger reporting groups
9 measures
20of 1,373
All Subjects — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,373 that report this measure · tied with 1
26of 1,345
Academic Growth
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,345 that report this measure · tied with 25
35of 1,367
Math — Masters
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,367 that report this measure · tied with 2
38of 1,372
Reading — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,372 that report this measure · tied with 5
43of 1,373
All Subjects — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,373 that report this measure · tied with 8
43of 1,367
Math — Meets
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,367 that report this measure · tied with 10
52of 1,415
Overall score
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,415 that report this measure · tied with 25
64of 1,373
All Subjects — Approaches
Similar economic-disadvantage rate · of the 1,373 that report this measure · tied with 19
119of 4,006
Relative Performance
Similar size · of the 4,006 that report this measure · tied with 69
These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above
this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears
once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any
tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones
no school would put in a press release.
Where this comes from
The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings,
outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through
txschools.gov,
fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal
links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's
PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026.
The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.
Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to
link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before
pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row
in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 079901153.