Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Alba-Golden Elem

Wood County · Region 07: Kilgore · 367 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
74/1002025-26
Change
−5 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
−6.5 ptsvs 80.5 average · 1,962 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
1,461 of 1,962tied with 65 others
C74

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving down; under the rules in force back then it scored 76 in 2021-22. The current score is below the 80.5 average for 1,962 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Current strength

Chronically absent lower than the similar-context average

11.7% −4.5 pts vs 16.2%

  • 11.7% is 4.5 percentage points lower than the 16.2% average among 1,903 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Alba-Golden Elem is rated C by TEA, scoring 74 out of 100 for 2025-26 — below the 80.5 average for 1,962 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is down 5 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 1,461st of 1,962 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 65 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. Who this school serves
  6. Student counts behind the percentages
  7. Enrollment over time
  8. Discipline and removal from class
  9. Spending per student
  10. Teachers and actual class size
  11. Where this school ranks best
  12. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
90807060 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageAlba-Golden Elem 7970768374 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated C with 76 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26C7480.5 1,962 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8380.3 1,938 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24C7678.2 1,918 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23C7078.7 1,887 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22C7982.4 1,862 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement75 C−3.7 vs similar economic context · 1,876 reporting
  • School Progress77 C−4.2 vs similar economic context · 1,869 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps68 D−9.7 vs similar economic context · 1,851 reporting
  • Academic Growth69 D−5.2 vs similar economic context · 1,813 reporting
  • Relative Performance77 C−2.5 vs similar economic context · 1,869 reporting
  • Alba-Golden Elem
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,962 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement75C5
School Progress77C3
Closing the Gaps68D2
Academic Growth69D1
Relative Performance77C3

Closest to moving up: Closing the Gaps, 2 points below C in that domain — the nearest of the measures that count toward the overall rating.

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is School Progress (77), so Student Achievement (75) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 77.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level75%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,876 reporting
  • Meets grade level48%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,876 reporting
  • Masters grade level19%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,876 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level74%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,873 reporting
  • Meets grade level51%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,873 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,873 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level74%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,865 reporting
  • Meets grade level45%+2 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,865 reporting
  • Masters grade level16%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,865 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level81%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,717 reporting
  • Meets grade level46%−1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,717 reporting
  • Masters grade level27%+6 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,717 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (1,962 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
367
Economically disadvantaged
61.6%−0.4 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
2.7%−13.8 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
23.4%+4.5 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
95.0%+0.8 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
11.7%−4.5 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Alba-Golden Elem

Hispanic: 14.4%White: 82.6%Two or More Races: 3%
  • Hispanic 14.4%
  • White 82.6%
  • Two or More Races 3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,962 reporting for every category shown · 1,962 in full cohort

African American: 10.6%Hispanic: 49.3%White: 33.5%American Indian: 0.3%Asian: 2.3%Pacific Islander: 0.2%Two or More Races: 3.8%
  • African American 10.6%
  • Hispanic 49.3%
  • White 33.5%
  • American Indian 0.3%
  • Asian 2.3%
  • Pacific Islander 0.2%
  • Two or More Races 3.8%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
367
Economically disadvantaged students
226
Emergent bilingual students
10
Special education students
86

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
36
Students in TEA mobility denominator
301
TEA-published mobility rate
12%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA did not publish an enrollment count for 2025–26 in this PEIMS report, so no current year-over-year change is calculated. The latest available PEIMS count is 396 students in 2023–24.

Latest available PEIMS enrollment
396

2023–24

Enrollment in 2023–24

This school
396
Selected comparison
640.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,874 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Alba-Golden Elem
School yearStudents enrolledAlba-Golden ElemChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 429 First available year 638.9
2022–23 Not reported Not available —
2023–24 396 No adjacent prior year 640.8
2024–25 Not reported Not available —
2025–26 Not reported Not available —

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
Suppressed

Rate not available

Disciplinary actions
Suppressed

Rate not available

Cumulative year-end enrollment
409

2024–25

TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Alba-Golden Elem
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 446 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2021–22 462 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
2022–23 432 44 10.2% 113 26.16 13.1% 31
2023–24 424 18 4.3% 19 4.48 13.0% 30.8
2024–25 409 Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Alba-Golden Elem in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
In-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Out-of-school suspensions Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$5k$13k$20k20182020202220242025
  • Alba-Golden Elem
  • Parent district: Alba-Golden ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,086
Selected comparison
$12,551

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,934 rated schools reporting

−$3,465 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,086 per student for this campus, $15,033 per student for its parent district, Alba-Golden ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearAlba-Golden ElemParent district: Alba-Golden ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$5,796$10,682$13,054$7,932 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,791 rated schools reporting
2019$6,293$10,621$13,108$8,077 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,807 rated schools reporting
2020$7,323$13,174$14,058$8,684 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,828 rated schools reporting
2021$8,485$14,156$14,797$9,103 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,843 rated schools reporting
2022$8,506$14,634$15,708$10,469 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,863 rated schools reporting
2023$7,731$13,574$16,792$11,121 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,887 rated schools reporting
2024$9,385$15,660$18,125$11,960 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,914 rated schools reporting
2025$9,086$15,033$18,972$12,551 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,934 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$66,192−$194 vs similar economic context
Teachers
30−12.1 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
12.2−6.9 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Alba-Golden Elem

Beginning: 14.6%1 to 5 years: 6%6 to 10 years: 17.5%11 to 20 years: 32.5%21 to 30 years: 26.5%Over 30 years: 3%
  • Beginning 14.6%
  • 1 to 5 years 6%
  • 6 to 10 years 17.5%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.5%
  • 21 to 30 years 26.5%
  • Over 30 years 3%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 1,962 reporting for every category shown · 1,962 in full cohort

Beginning: 6.2%1 to 5 years: 25.7%6 to 10 years: 19.1%11 to 20 years: 28.3%21 to 30 years: 16.1%Over 30 years: 4.2%
  • Beginning 6.2%
  • 1 to 5 years 25.7%
  • 6 to 10 years 19.1%
  • 11 to 20 years 28.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.1%
  • Over 30 years 4.2%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Alba-Golden Elem in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classAlba-Golden Elem · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Kindergarten1718
Grade 115.318.2
Grade 213.918.4
Grade 314.818.6
Grade 414.218.9
Grade 512.519.7

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 6 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 105 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

12 measures

  • 4of 16

    Math — Masters

    Wood County · of the 16 that report this measure

  • 5of 16

    Math — Meets

    Wood County · of the 16 that report this measure

  • 5of 15

    Science — Masters

    Wood County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 7of 16

    Math — Approaches

    Wood County · of the 16 that report this measure

  • 8of 16

    Reading — Masters

    Wood County · of the 16 that report this measure

  • 8of 15

    Science — Approaches

    Wood County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 17

    Chronically absent (lowest is best)

    Wood County · of the 17 that report this measure

  • 9of 16

    All Subjects — Masters

    Wood County · of the 16 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 9of 15

    Academic Growth

    Wood County · of the 15 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 17

    Attendance

    Wood County · of the 17 that report this measure

  • 10of 16

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Wood County · of the 16 that report this measure · tied with 1

  • 10of 16

    All Subjects — Meets

    Wood County · of the 16 that report this measure

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 250906101.