Independent Texas school research. TEA data, clearly explained. Not affiliated with the state agencyTEA.

txschools.netSchool data with context

Traditional public school campus

Alamo Heights HS

Bexar County · Region 20: San Antonio · 1,569 students

Official school websiteSchool information and family resources

Current score
91/1002025-26
Change
+9 ptssince 2021-22
Score vs similar economic context
±0.0 ptsvs 91 average · 646 rated schools serving a similar economic context
Similar economic-disadvantage rate placement
351 of 646tied with 65 others
A91

At a glance

Under TEA’s current rules, the available rating history is moving up; under the rules in force back then it scored 89 in 2021-22. The current score is level with the 91 average for 646 rated schools serving a similar economic context.

Evidence worth noticing

Strengths and momentum

Recent domain gain

Closing the Gaps rose 11 points

82 to 93 2024-25 to 2025-26

  • 93 is 4.4 points above the 88.6 average among 631 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.
See the full measure

STAAR result

Science above similar-context averages at Meets and Masters

Meets
85%vs 68.5% avg · +16.5 pts
Masters
55%vs 42.4% avg · +12.6 pts

Among 597 schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate reporting this measure.

See the full measure

Selected positive signals, not a summary of performance. The same rules choose them on every page: only the latest one-year gain, results meaningfully better than the currently selected comparison with broad reporting, and distinctive top-three placements. Demographics, staffing and spending cannot become academic “wins.” The overall rating and the full results below remain the complete picture for this school.

Read the full rating context and placement

Alamo Heights HS is rated A by TEA, scoring 91 out of 100 for 2025-26 — level with the 91 average for 646 rated schools serving a similar economic context. It is up 9 points since 2021-22.

Ranks 351st of 646 rated schools serving a similar economic context (tied with 65 others).

Put the numbers in context

Compare with

Jump to a section
  1. Overview
  2. 5 years of ratings
  3. Where the score comes from
  4. Student outcomes
  5. After high school: the following fall
  6. Who this school serves
  7. Student counts behind the percentages
  8. Enrollment over time
  9. Discipline and removal from class
  10. Spending per student
  11. Teachers and actual class size
  12. Where this school ranks best
  13. Where this comes from

5 years of ratings

Follow the solid line to see how this school has changed. Turn comparison lines on or off to add context.

Compare against
908070 Similar economic-disadvantage rateTexas averageAlamo Heights HS 8286888591 2021-222022-232023-242024-252025-26

2021-22 is shown under the refreshed methodology TEA adopted in 2023, so it is comparable with later years. Under the original scoring it was rated B with 89 that year.

Comparison lines follow the current rated cohort backward through time. The table gives the number in that fixed cohort that reported a score each year; it can be smaller than cohort membership.

View the yearly scores and comparisons
Rating history with comparisons
YearRatingScoreSelected comparisonSimilar economic-disadvantage rateStateTexas average
2025-26A9191.0 646 reporting81.3 7,646 reporting
2024-25B8591.3 637 reporting81.2 7,554 reporting
2023-24B8890.4 621 reporting78.9 7,466 reporting
2022-23B8690.8 604 reporting79.1 7,377 reporting
2021-22B8291.4 594 reporting83.7 7,283 reporting

Where the score comes from

Texas builds the overall rating from the better of Student Achievement and School Progress, weighted 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. School Progress is itself the better of Academic Growth and Relative Performance. The 60, 70, 80 and 90 rules mark the letter-grade thresholds.

  • Student Achievement90 A−2.0 vs similar economic context · 635 reporting
  • School Progress80 B−7.3 vs similar economic context · 633 reporting
  • Closing the Gaps93 A+4.4 vs similar economic context · 631 reporting
  • Academic Growth80 B−5.5 vs similar economic context · 630 reporting
  • Relative Performance79 C+0.3 vs similar economic context · 633 reporting
  • Alamo Heights HS
  • Similar economic-disadvantage rate (646 in cohort)
Domain scores
DomainScoreGradePoints to next grade
Student Achievement90A—
School Progress80B10
Closing the Gaps93A—
Academic Growth80B10
Relative Performance79C1

TEA does not add the domains up. The overall score is the better of Student Achievement and School Progress at 70%, plus Closing the Gaps at 30%. For this school that better measure is Student Achievement (90), so School Progress (80) is published above but does not enter the overall score at all — gaining points there changes nothing until it passes 90.

Student outcomes

STAAR performance

All Subjects

  • Approaches grade level91%+1 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 635 reporting
  • Meets grade level77%+3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 635 reporting
  • Masters grade level34%−10 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 635 reporting
Reading3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level88%−3 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 635 reporting
  • Meets grade level74%−5 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 635 reporting
  • Masters grade level17%−30 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 635 reporting
Math3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level89%+0 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 633 reporting
  • Meets grade level66%−4 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 633 reporting
  • Masters grade level21%−19 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 633 reporting
Science3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level97%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 597 reporting
  • Meets grade level85%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 597 reporting
  • Masters grade level55%+13 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 597 reporting
Social Studies3 performance levels
  • Approaches grade level97%+8 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 234 reporting
  • Meets grade level87%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 234 reporting
  • Masters grade level62%+17 vs Similar economic-disadvantage rate · 234 reporting
  • Approaches grade level
  • Meets grade level
  • Masters grade level
  • Tick: Similar economic-disadvantage rate (646 in cohort)

Percentage of tests at or above each level. Masters is a subset of Meets, which is a subset of Approaches. The selected-comparison tick on each bar marks the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate — a comparison TEA does not publish.

Graduation

Four-Year
97.1%+10.2 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 116 rated schools reporting
Five-Year
98.2%+10.3 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 116 rated schools reporting
Six-Year
99.1%+12.8 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 116 rated schools reporting
Dropout Rate
0.3%+0.1 pts vs similar economic context average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 117 rated schools reporting

These measures use TEA's standard-accountability population. Each comparison average includes only schools in that population that report that specific measure; its reporting count is shown beside the average. It is an unweighted average of those reported school rates, not a pooled rate across every student in the group.

College, career and military readiness

Total credit for CCMR criteria
84.0%−4.5 pts vs similar economic context
CCMR criteria
CriterionThis school% of graduatesAveragesimilar economic contextDifferencepercentage pointsReportingselected comparison
Total credit for CCMR criteria84.0%88.5%−4.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 112 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA, or earned credit for a college prep course64.9%68.9%−4.0 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated schools reporting
Scored at or above the college ready standard on SAT, ACT, TSIA51.9%56.4%−4.5 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated schools reporting
Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)56.6%36.2%+20.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated schools reporting
Earned college credit for a dual credit course22.1%36.4%−14.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated schools reporting
Earned an industry-based certification14.9%27.7%−12.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated schools reporting
Earned a level I or level II certificate0.0%0.3%−0.3 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated schools reporting
Earned an associate degree0.0%0.9%−0.9 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated schools reporting
Completed an OnRamps course and qualified for college credit4.5%9.9%−5.4 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated schools reporting
Graduated with completed individualized education program (IEP) and workforce readiness2.4%2.2%+0.2 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated schools reporting
Graduated under an advanced diploma plan and identified as a current special education student4.0%5.8%−1.8 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated schools reporting
Enlisted in the U.S. Armed Forces1.9%1.8%+0.1 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 114 rated schools reporting

Every row is a share of this school's graduates, and every row is a way of meeting CCMR — so on every row, a bigger share is better. Difference is this school minus the average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate, counted in percentage points: +5.0 would mean five more graduates in every hundred met that criterion here. The selected comparison is an unweighted average of the reported school percentages, not a pooled rate across all graduates in the group. Graduates may meet several criteria, so the rows do not add up to the total.

Counts in the comparison controls describe full cohort membership, not the denominator of every average. Each average uses only schools for which TEA reported that measure; metric-specific reporting counts are shown on the STAAR, graduation and CCMR rows and may vary.

After high school: the following fall

Where school graduates appeared in Texas public higher-education records the fall after graduation. This is a limited next-step measure, not an eventual college-going or completion rate.

Graduates in the report
385

Class of 2023–24

Enrolled in Texas public higher education
154

40.0% of graduates

Not found in Texas public higher-ed records
160

41.6% of graduates

Not trackable
71

Fall 2024

Graduates in the report

This school
385
Selected comparison
421.8

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 99 rated schools reporting

Enrolled in Texas public higher education

This school
154
Selected comparison
194.7

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 99 rated schools reporting

Texas-public enrollment rate

This school
40.0%
Selected comparison
49.1%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 99 rated schools reporting

−9.1 pts vs similar economic context

Not-found rate

This school
41.6%
Selected comparison
39.9%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 99 rated schools reporting

+1.7 pts vs similar economic context

Not-trackable rate

This school
18.4%
Selected comparison
11.0%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 99 rated schools reporting

+7.4 pts vs similar economic context

Most common named Texas public destinations

  1. ALAMO CCD SAN ANTONIO COLLEGE (009163)29
  2. U. OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN (003658)20
  3. TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY (003632)19

Selected comparison counts are neutral cohort scale context. The percentages put differently sized graduating classes on the same basis, but still cover only the limited Texas-public system observed by this report.

Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, high-school graduates enrolled in higher education, fetched 24 August 2026. The report covers graduates who enrolled in a Texas public college or university the following fall and includes only districts or campuses with more than 25 graduates.

“Not found” does not mean a graduate did not continue their education. It can include private or out-of-state college, work, military service, enrollment after the fall term, or another path the Texas public system does not observe.

“Not trackable” is not an outcome. THECB uses it for graduates with a non-standard identifier that could not be matched to higher-education records.

Who this school serves

Placed after the results deliberately: this is context for reading them, not an explanation of them.

Students
1,569
Economically disadvantaged
13.0%−0.9 pts vs similar economic context
English learners
5.5%−5.2 pts vs similar economic context
Special education
10.1%−5.7 pts vs similar economic context
Attendance
94.6%−1.3 pts vs similar economic context
Chronically absent
13.0%+6.0 pts vs similar economic context

Student demographics

Alamo Heights HS

African American: 2.3%Hispanic: 41.7%White: 51.5%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 3.4%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 0.5%
  • African American 2.3%
  • Hispanic 41.7%
  • White 51.5%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 3.4%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 0.5%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 646 reporting for every category shown · 646 in full cohort

African American: 6.1%Hispanic: 19.9%White: 48.1%American Indian: 0.4%Asian: 19.7%Pacific Islander: 0.1%Two or More Races: 5.6%
  • African American 6.1%
  • Hispanic 19.9%
  • White 48.1%
  • American Indian 0.4%
  • Asian 19.7%
  • Pacific Islander 0.1%
  • Two or More Races 5.6%

Student counts behind the percentages

Context only. These counts are not rankings, comparisons, or judgments about school quality.

Students in this TEA accountability summary
1,569
Economically disadvantaged students
204
Emergent bilingual students
86
Special education students
159

Early college pathways

Early College High School
158

TEA-published share: 10.1%

Pathways in Technology Early College High School (P-TECH)
18

TEA-published share: 1.1%

Campus mobility · 2024–25

Mobile students
112
Students in TEA mobility denominator
1,624
TEA-published mobility rate
6.9%

The mobility count and rate use TEA’s separate 2024–25 campus denominator shown above, not current enrollment. This site does not recalculate a missing rate.

The first figure is TEA’s student count for this accountability summary. It is a separate publication from the fall PEIMS enrollment shown above and can differ; this site does not substitute one for the other. Counts come from TEA’s 2025-26 accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026. A reported zero is shown as 0. Small-number and complementary masks, unavailable values, and blank not-reported fields stay separate and are never estimated. TEA masking definitions.

Enrollment over time

TEA-reported student enrollment for each available school year. Enrollment growth or decline is not a measure of school quality.

TEA reported 1,569 students in 2025–26, no change from 2024–25.

Latest enrollment
1,569

2025–26

Change from 2024–25
0

No change

Change since 2021–22
−81

Decrease · −4.9%

Enrollment in 2025–26

This school
1,569
Selected comparison
860.9

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 642 rated schools reporting

Student enrollment by school year for Alamo Heights HS
School yearStudents enrolledAlamo Heights HSChange from previous school yearAverage enrollmentselected comparison
2021–22 1,650 First available year 871.7
2022–23 1,606 Decrease of 44 (2.7%) 891.6
2023–24 1,537 Decrease of 69 (4.3%) 878
2024–25 1,569 Increase of 32 (2.1%) 871.3
2025–26 1,569 No change 860.9

The selected comparison column is the average enrollment among reporting schools in that group. It changes with the comparison control; this school's own counts do not.

Source: TEA PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. TEA reports these counts from its fall student snapshot; changes compare adjacent reported school years.

These counts show how enrollment changed, not why. Attendance-zone changes, school openings or closures, grade reconfigurations, transfers and population shifts can affect the total.

Discipline and removal from class

TEA’s annual student and action counts, kept separate and divided only by the matching full-year enrollment. These figures describe removals from instruction, not a simple safe-or-unsafe score.

Students in TEA’s all-discipline count
93

5.7% of cumulative year-end enrollment

Disciplinary actions
169

10.41 per 100 students

Cumulative year-end enrollment
1,624

2024–25

Share of students · 2024–25

This school
5.7%
Selected comparison
5.4%

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 392 rated schools reporting

+0.3 pts vs similar economic context

Actions per 100 students · 2024–25

This school
10.41
Selected comparison
9.5

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 459 rated schools reporting

+0.9 vs similar economic context
TEA all-discipline student and action counts by school year for Alamo Heights HS
School yearCumulative enrollmentStudentsall disciplineStudents% of enrollmentActionsall disciplineActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
2020–21 1,702 39 2.3% 65 3.82 4.0% 6.5
2021–22 1,695 117 6.9% 246 14.51 5.5% 9.5
2022–23 1,653 153 9.3% 319 19.30 5.7% 9.9
2023–24 1,578 94 6.0% 200 12.67 5.5% 9.8
2024–25 1,624 93 5.7% 169 10.41 5.4% 9.5
See 2024–25 discipline categories
TEA discipline categories for Alamo Heights HS in 2024–25
CategoryStudentsStudents% of enrollmentActionsActionsper 100 studentsStudentsselected comparison average %Actionsselected comparison average per 100
All discipline 93 5.7% 169 10.41 5.4% 9.5
In-school suspensions 56 3.5% 77 4.74 5.0% 7.6
Out-of-school suspensions 42 2.6% 48 2.96 2.4% 3.2
DAEP placements 37 2.3% 41 2.52 1.8% 2
Mandatory DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
Discretionary DAEP placements Suppressed — Suppressed — — —
JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary JJAEP placements Not reported — Not reported — — —
Expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Mandatory expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —
Discretionary expulsions Not reported — Not reported — — —

Selected comparisons use rates, not raw counts, so differently sized schools can be read on the same basis. Each average uses only group members for which TEA reported that rate; this school's own counts and rates remain fixed.

Students, actions and incidents are different units. One student can receive multiple actions. The categories overlap, so they must not be added together. Rates use TEA's matching cumulative year-end enrollment, not the October enrollment shown elsewhere on this page.

Source: TEA Discipline Reports, fetched 24 August 2026. Suppressed values stay unavailable rather than being estimated. Use 2020–21 cautiously because remote instruction during the pandemic changed students' exposure to in-person discipline. TEA consolidated its separate action-group reports into this product in 2024–25; this trend uses only the stable “All discipline” heading.

Spending per student

The campus and its parent district stay fixed while the selected same-sector txschools.net comparison changes with the page-wide control. TEA's own peer group and statewide reference remain visible as separately published, fixed TEA references.

$7k$17k$28k20182020202220242025
  • Alamo Heights HS
  • Parent district: Alamo Heights ISD
  • Texas average
  • Selected comparison: Similar economic-disadvantage rate

Spending per student · 2025

This school
$9,438
Selected comparison
$10,857

average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 637 rated schools reporting

−$1,419 vs similar economic context

For 2025, TEA reported $9,438 per student for this campus, $26,637 per student for its parent district, Alamo Heights ISD, $18,972 per student for the Texas average.

Not reported in this TEA campus finance record: TEA peer group.

View yearly spending figures
Spending per student by year
YearAlamo Heights HSParent district: Alamo Heights ISDTexas averageSelected comparison averageReportingselected comparison
2018$7,960$17,313$13,054$7,306 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 545 rated schools reporting
2019$8,074$20,758$13,108$7,406 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 562 rated schools reporting
2020$8,151$21,292$14,058$7,718 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 575 rated schools reporting
2021$7,870$19,476$14,797$8,297 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 585 rated schools reporting
2022$8,887$15,959$15,708$9,538 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 595 rated schools reporting
2023$9,764$19,766$16,792$9,657 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 604 rated schools reporting
2024$9,405$20,604$18,125$10,675 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 622 rated schools reporting
2025$9,438$26,637$18,972$10,857 average for schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 637 rated schools reporting

The selected-comparison reporting count is year-specific and can vary across the table. Dollar amounts are shown as TEA published them and are not adjusted for inflation.

Teachers and actual class size

Average salary
$62,114−$7,150 vs similar economic context
Teachers
108+52.8 vs similar economic context
Students per staff member
14.5−0.4 vs similar economic context

Teaching experience

Alamo Heights HS

Beginning: 0.9%1 to 5 years: 11.1%6 to 10 years: 21.9%11 to 20 years: 32.3%21 to 30 years: 25.4%Over 30 years: 8.4%
  • Beginning 0.9%
  • 1 to 5 years 11.1%
  • 6 to 10 years 21.9%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.3%
  • 21 to 30 years 25.4%
  • Over 30 years 8.4%

Selected comparison average For schools with a similar economic-disadvantage rate · 646 reporting for every category shown · 646 in full cohort

Beginning: 4.3%1 to 5 years: 23.3%6 to 10 years: 20%11 to 20 years: 32.4%21 to 30 years: 16.9%Over 30 years: 2.7%
  • Beginning 4.3%
  • 1 to 5 years 23.3%
  • 6 to 10 years 20%
  • 11 to 20 years 32.4%
  • 21 to 30 years 16.9%
  • Over 30 years 2.7%

Average students in a class

TEA average class size by grade or subject for Alamo Heights HS in 2024–25
Grade or subjectAverage students per classAlamo Heights HS · 2024–25Average students per classselected comparison
Secondary English22.818.4
Secondary languages other than English22.420.9
Secondary math26.318.6
Secondary science28.321.2
Secondary social studies28.921.3

These are TEA's actual class-size averages for the grade or subject shown, not the student-to-teacher ratio. TEA reported 5 of 12 categories for this campus; the categories are not combined into a made-up campus-wide average. Each selected comparison average uses only schools reporting that same grade or subject.

Source: TEA Texas Academic Performance Reports, fetched 24 August 2026.

Where this school ranks best

Out of 200 rankings computed across every published metric and every available comparison group, these are all the measures that meet this site’s distinctive-placement threshold. The list does not change when you change Compare against. Each measure appears once, using its strongest placement. Press Copy for a citable sentence.

#4–10 rankings

Fourth- through tenth-place results

5 measures

  • 4of 65

    Met criterion score on AP/IB exam(s)

    Bexar County · of the 65 that report this measure

  • 6of 149

    Social Studies — Masters

    Bexar County · of the 149 that report this measure

  • 7of 149

    Social Studies — Meets

    Bexar County · of the 149 that report this measure

  • 9of 380

    Science — Masters

    Bexar County · of the 380 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 10of 380

    Science — Meets

    Bexar County · of the 380 that report this measure · tied with 2

Other top-5% rankings

High placements in larger reporting groups

6 measures

  • 13of 380

    Science — Approaches

    Bexar County · of the 380 that report this measure · tied with 6

  • 14of 384

    Closing the Gaps

    Bexar County · of the 384 that report this measure · tied with 6

  • 17of 386

    All Subjects — Meets

    Bexar County · of the 386 that report this measure · tied with 2

  • 19of 386

    All Subjects — Approaches

    Bexar County · of the 386 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 19of 386

    Math — Approaches

    Bexar County · of the 386 that report this measure · tied with 4

  • 21of 386

    Math — Meets

    Bexar County · of the 386 that report this measure · tied with 3

These are selected high placements, not a summary. Every figure above this section is the full picture, including where this school ranks poorly. Each measure appears once here, using its strongest qualifying placement across all available comparison groups. Very large ties are left out because they do not distinguish this school; any tie that does appear is labeled. Every ranking this site publishes, including the ones no school would put in a press release.

Where this comes from

The Texas Education Agency publishes the underlying accountability reports and data downloads. Ratings, outcomes, demographics, staffing and finance on this page come from TEA data available through txschools.gov, fetched 15 August 2026. TEA’s Reports and Data Portal links the official bulk files. Enrollment history comes from TEA's PEIMS Student Program and Special Populations reports, fetched 24 August 2026. The student-count context comes from TEA’s bulk accountability summary, fetched 29 August 2026; TEA’s masking definitions explain withheld values. The dated notice, staffing, discipline, transfer, community and postsecondary sections cite their separate TEA, Census or THECB publication in place. Every archived source carries checksums so each number stays traceable to the bytes the public agency served.

Download the full dataset · this campus's district

Single-file records are pre-built for district-level records only, so there is no per-campus CSV to link here. Producing both formats for every entity would consume most of the 20,000-asset deployment limit before pages and shared data are counted. This campus is a row in the bulk files on the download page, keyed by its TEA id 015901001.